EGU23-6738, updated on 25 Feb 2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6738
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Does the Middle Miocene rise of the Greater Himalaya cause the slow down of Southern Tibet exhumation?

Rasmus Thiede1, Dirk Scherler2,3, and Christoph Glotzbach4
Rasmus Thiede et al.
  • 1Christian Albrecht Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Geowissenschaften, Kiel, Germany (rasmus.thiede@ifg.uni-kiel.de)
  • 2Helmholtz Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches GeoForschungs Zentrum GFZ, Germany
  • 3Institut für Geographische Wissenschaften, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
  • 4Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Tübingen, Germany

The Himalaya is the highest and steepest mountain range on Earth and forms today efficient north-south barrier for moisture-bearing winds. 1D-thermokinematic modeling of new zircon (U-Th)/He bedrock-cooling ages and >100 previously published mica 40Ar/39Ar, zircon and apatite fission track ages from the Sutlej Valley document a consistent rapid decrease in exhumation rates that initiated at ~17-15 Ma across the entire Greater and Tethyan Himalaya and the north-Himalayan Leo Pargil dome. We observe a rapid decrease from >1 km/Myr to <0.5 km/Myr. Simultaneous changes in the hanging and footwall of major Miocene shear zones suggest that cooling is associated to surface erosion and not due to tectonic unroofing such as due to E-W extension. We explain the middle Miocene deceleration of exhumation with major tectonic reorganization of the Himalayan orogen, probably coincident with the onset of basal accretion, which resulted in accelerated uplift of the Greater and Tethyan Himalaya above a mid-crustal ramp and the establishment of a new efficient orographic barrier. The period of slow exhumation in the upper Sutlej Valley coincides with a period of internal drainage in the south-Tibetan Zada Basin farther upstream, which we interpret to be a consequence of tectonic damming. Exhumation rates in the upper Sutlej Valley accelerate again at ~5-3 Ma, and allowed the Sutlej River to re-establish external drainage of the Zada Basin. Comparison with other data from the Himalaya and Southern Tibet along strike suggests that by ~15 Ma, southern Tibet was high, located in the rain shadow of the High Himalaya and eroding slowly for at least 10 Ma, before erosion accelerated again by ~5-3 Ma, most likely due to climatic changes. Our new finding document that the location of tectonic deformation processes controls the first order spatial pattern of both climatic zones and erosion across the orogen. Therefore, we think that the rise of Greater Himalaya is linked to the deceleration of exhumation in Southern Tibet.

How to cite: Thiede, R., Scherler, D., and Glotzbach, C.: Does the Middle Miocene rise of the Greater Himalaya cause the slow down of Southern Tibet exhumation?, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-6738, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6738, 2023.