EGU23-9328, updated on 19 Apr 2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9328
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

The EUPPBench postprocessing benchmark

Jonas Bhend3, Jonathan Demaeyer1,2, Sebastian Lerch4, Cristina Primo5, Bert Van Schaeybroeck1, Aitor Atencia6, Zied Ben Bouallègue7, Jieyu Chen4, Markus Dabernig6, Gavin Evans8, Jana Faganeli Pucer9, Ben Hooper8, Nina Horat4, David Jobst10, Janko Merše11, Peter Mlakar9,11, Annette Möller12, Olivier Mestre13, Maxime Taillardat13, and Stéphane Vannitsem1,2
Jonas Bhend et al.
  • 1Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
  • 2European Meteorological Network (EUMETNET), Brussels, Belgium
  • 3Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss, Zürich-Flughafen, Switzerland (jonas.bhend@meteoswiss.ch)
  • 4Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 5Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany
  • 6GeoSphere Austria, Vienna, Austria
  • 7European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, United Kingdom
  • 8Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom
  • 9University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, Slovenia
  • 10University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
  • 11Slovenian Environment Agency, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 12Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
  • 13Meteo France, Ecole Nationale de la Météorologie, Toulouse, France

Statistical postprocessing of forecasts from numerical weather prediction systems is an important component of modern weather forecasting systems. A growing variety of postprocessing methods has been proposed, but a comprehensive, community-driven comparison of their relative performance is yet to be established. Important reasons for this lack include the absence of a fair intercomparison protocol, and, the difficulty of constructing a common comprehensive dataset that can be used to perform such intercomparison. Here we introduce the first version of the EUPPBench, a dataset of time-aligned medium-range forecasts and observations over Central Europe, with the aim to facilitate and standardize the intercomparison of postprocessing methods. This dataset is publicly available [1], includes station and gridded data, ensemble forecasts for training (20 years) and validation (2 years) based on the ECMWF system. The initial dataset is the basis of an ongoing activity to establish a benchmarking platform for postprocessing of medium-range weather forecasts. We showcase a first benchmark of several methods for the adjustment of near-surface temperature forecasts and outline the future plans for the benchmark activity. 

 

[1] https://github.com/EUPP-benchmark/climetlab-eumetnet-postprocessing-benchmark

How to cite: Bhend, J., Demaeyer, J., Lerch, S., Primo, C., Van Schaeybroeck, B., Atencia, A., Ben Bouallègue, Z., Chen, J., Dabernig, M., Evans, G., Faganeli Pucer, J., Hooper, B., Horat, N., Jobst, D., Merše, J., Mlakar, P., Möller, A., Mestre, O., Taillardat, M., and Vannitsem, S.: The EUPPBench postprocessing benchmark, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-9328, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9328, 2023.