EGU24-10195, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-10195
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Identifying uncataloged low-frequency earthquake sources with deep learning

Jannes Münchmeyer1, Sophie Giffard-Roisin1, Marielle Malfante2, William Frank3, Piero Poli4, David Marsan1, and Anne Socquet1
Jannes Münchmeyer et al.
  • 1Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IRD, Univ. Gustave Eiffel, ISTerre, Grenoble, France (munchmej@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr)
  • 2Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, List, Grenoble, France
  • 3Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • 4Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy

Tectonic faults exhibit a wide spectrum of processes releasing stress: from fast earthquakes to slow deformation. Mapping smaller-scale slow deformation directly is challenging because of the limited signal-to-noise ratio of geodetic recordings. Instead, we need to rely on other telltale signs of slow deformation. Low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs) are such signs: a class of seismically observable signals that coincide with slow deformation.

However, detecting LFEs is challenging due to their emergent nature and generally low magnitude. The most common method for LFE detection is template matching. Due to the need for waveform templates, this method is specific to a set of LFE sources and seismic stations. This limitation renders the template matching unable to discover uncataloged sources or detect LFEs in regions without prior known LFE activity.

Here, we present a novel, deep learning method for detecting LFEs. Our method detects phase arrivals from LFEs, allowing to detect them with a workflow closely modeled after a standard earthquake detection workflow. In contrast to template matching, the deep learning method is substantially more flexible and can generalise to unknown LFEs and even across world regions. We apply our method to a diverse set of regions, including regions with previously known LFE activity, such as Cascadia and Nankai, and without known LFE activity, such as Northern Chile.

How to cite: Münchmeyer, J., Giffard-Roisin, S., Malfante, M., Frank, W., Poli, P., Marsan, D., and Socquet, A.: Identifying uncataloged low-frequency earthquake sources with deep learning, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-10195, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-10195, 2024.