EGU24-12018, updated on 09 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-12018
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Unveiling the springtime phenological strategies in permafrost vegetation

Yu Zhu1,2,3, Fabrice Lacroix1,4,5, Lei Liu6, Dongsheng Zhao2, and Sönke Zaehle1
Yu Zhu et al.
  • 1Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Biogeochemical Signals, Germany (yzhu@bgc-jena.mpg.de)
  • 2Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • 3College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • 4Climate and Environmental Physics, University of Bern
  • 5Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern
  • 6The school of Geo-Science & Technology, Zhengzhou University

The springtime phenology in permafrost regions of the Northern Hemisphere is exhibiting an extensive advance in response to climate change that is considered to be primarily driven by the rising temperature that vastly exceeds the average rate of global warming. This phenological trend emerges as the result of spatial variability in temperature and the response of vegetation to temperature (referred to here as the temperature sensitivity (ST) of phenology, change in phenological timing per unit change in temperature). In contrast to the more well-defined pattern of temperature variability, far less is known about the temperature sensitivity of vegetation phenology. Further, the above-average and highly heterogeneous warming in permafrost regions leads to changes in chilling exposure, frost risk, and other key controllers of temperature sensitivity, potentially allowing plants to adapt their phenological strategies. However, these phenological strategies  have not been investigated yet at the pan-Arctic scale in models or observations.

Here, we seek to combine remote sensing-based and process model-based approaches to reveal the spatiotemporal pattern and strategic mechanisms regarding the ST of springtime phenology. To obtain generalisable dependencies, remote sensing retrieved phenology, climate data and soil physical property data are used to explore the linkages between ST and temperature and permafrost drivers, providing insights on vegetation phenological strategies. The novel QUINCY model is then adopted at site levels to validate the plausibility of possible strategies. Sets of model experiments with respect to varying biological and environmental factors are applied to elucidate the major controllers. Results shed light on the importance of environmental variability, and provide a more elaborate explanation for the ST variability of spring-time phenology.

How to cite: Zhu, Y., Lacroix, F., Liu, L., Zhao, D., and Zaehle, S.: Unveiling the springtime phenological strategies in permafrost vegetation, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-12018, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-12018, 2024.