A multi-model analysis of the PMIP LGM AMOC
- 1University of the Ryukyus, Japan (sam@sci.u-ryukyu.ac.jp)
- 2Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Germany
- 3University of Toyama, Japan
- 4Max Plank Institute for Meteorology, Germany
- 5University of Leeds, United Kingdom
- 6The University of Tokyo, Japan
Simulating and reproducing the past Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) with comprehensive climate models are essential to test the ability of models to simulate different climates. At the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), reconstructions show a shoaling of the AMOC compared to modern climate. However, almost all state-of-the-art climate models simulate a deeper LGM AMOC. Here, we conduct a multi-model analysis using outputs from all PMIP phases (PMIP2 to PMIP4) to consistently explore the causes of this paleodata-model mismatch. The analysis focuses on the role of sea-surface temperature biases in the piControl simulation as well as changes in ocean temperature, salinity and density in each oceanic basin. We further compare the deepwater formation regions in each model and explore potential implications on the interpretation of paleodata-model comparison.
How to cite: Sherriff-Tadano, S., Klockmann, M., Kobayashi, H., Kapsch, M., Liu, B., Ivanovic, R., and Abe-Ouchi, A.: A multi-model analysis of the PMIP LGM AMOC, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-13543, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-13543, 2024.