EGU24-1383, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1383
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Basal debris at an Antarctic ice rise revealed by seismic amplitude-vs-angle analysis. 

Ronan Agnew1,2, Alex Brisbourne1, Adam Booth2, and Roger Clark2
Ronan Agnew et al.
  • 1British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
  • 2University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Reconstructing past ice sheets is important for understanding the response of modern ice sheets to changes in climate. The evolution of the Weddell Sea Sector’s grounding line since the last glacial maximum (LGM) to its present position remains ambiguous; previous authors have proposed hypotheses both of monotonic grounding line retreat and of rapid grounding line retreat followed by readvance. However, distinguishing these scenarios with current observations remains difficult. To explore these scenarios, we report seismic measurements of basal properties at KIR, an ice rise in the Weddell Sea Sector, West Antarctica. A three-component seismic survey enabled detection of the compressional (P) wave reflection and the converted (PS) wave reflection (an incident P wave converted to a shear wave at the base-ice reflector) from the base of KIR. Amplitude-vs-angle (AVA) analysis aims to constrain the physical properties (namely density, seismic velocity, by measuring the variation of reflectivity with incidence angle at the reflector. By jointly inverting the AVA responses of the PP wave reflection and the PS reflection, we increase the confidence in the interpretation of the base-ice properties. 

Analysis of PP and PS AVA responses at KIR indicates that the reflection arises from a material with a P wave velocity of 4.03 ± 0.05 km/s, an S wave velocity of 2.16 ± 0.06 km/s and a density of 1.44 ± 0.06 g/cm3; these properties are consistent with a reflection from a layer of entrained basal debris, with 20-30% debris by volume. The observed properties are not indicative of interference at a thin layer, as observed beneath glaciers elsewhere. The absence of deeper subglacial reflections indicates a poorly-defined boundary between this basal debris layer and the underlying subglacial material, which we therefore propose consists of frozen sediments . If this interpretation is correct, the presence of a debris layer overlying basal frozen sediment indicates a potential retreat/readvance scenario for KIR. A possible scenario is a previous episode of flow during which KIR may have been weakly grounded as an ice rumple, followed by grounding on the lee side of the bathymetric high and subsequent freezing of subglacial sediments. However, the origin of such a homogeneous and debris-rich layer remains unclear. The indication of a reflection from a basal debris layer raises questions about whether conventionally interpreted basal reflections can truly be considered as such, and whether these interpretations may mask the true nature of the underlying subglacial material. This ambiguity may be most effectively reconciled by borehole sampling.

How to cite: Agnew, R., Brisbourne, A., Booth, A., and Clark, R.: Basal debris at an Antarctic ice rise revealed by seismic amplitude-vs-angle analysis. , EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-1383, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1383, 2024.