Reframing the Arctic: An interdisciplinary and multi-scalar perspective on the divergence of boundaries and risk change in the Anthropocene
- 1Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- 2Earth & Life Institute (ELI) | Earth and Climate (ELIC) Université Catholique de Louvain Place Louis Pasteur 3, bte L4.03.08, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- 3University of Oslo, Geofag, Department of Geosciences, Norway (nanni@uio.no)
- 4Faculty of Social Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
- 5Department of European, International and Comparative Law, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 6Department of Maritime Studies, Texas A\&M University, Galveston, Texas, USA
- 7International Relations Institute, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 8School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- 9College of Business and Security Management, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA
- 10Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- 11Centre de recherche en science politique, Institut d'Études Européennes, UCLouvain Saint-Louis, Brussels, Belgium
- 12Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 13Institute of Geography and Regional Development, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland
The Arctic is experiencing rapid transformations driven by global warming and increased human activities. These changes have significant implications for the region's established boundaries and the risks tied to its transformation. Here, we investigate the complex dynamics and consequences of contemporary pressure on these boundaries through a socio-environmental perspective. By employing an interdisciplinary and multi-scalar approach, we examine the intricate interconnections between global, regional, and local changes within the Arctic. Our analysis revolves around three spheres: the boundaries historically used to define the Arctic and how recent changes in climate and political interest challenge our perception of the Arctic as a region; the complexity of bio-physical boundaries and jurisdictional disputes surrounding the Svalbard Archipelago; and the relationship between changing natural hazards and societal perception of risk in the town of Longyearbyen. Altogether, we underscore the interplay between policy-based science, science-based policy, and performative behavior in shaping borders and boundaries. In order to avoid crossing tipping points and irreversible limits of human adaptation, we argue for the adoption of a holistic approach that integrates diverse perspectives and scales to effectively manage resources, preserve the environment, mitigate risks, and uphold international relations within and beyond the Arctic. By considering ecological and social factors, our study emphasizes the need for integrated approaches to address time-sensitive challenges surpassing the resilience capacities of local communities and encompassing vast spatial scales extending beyond their usual spheres of influence.
How to cite: Lundén, A., DeRepentigny, P., Nanni, U., Popovaitė, V., Shen, Y., Basaran, I. K., Neubern, N. D., Mascorda-Cabre, L., Bennett, A., Vold Hansen, T., Holmes, F. A., Kavvatha, E., Meyer, A., Prakash, A., and Wołoszyn, A.: Reframing the Arctic: An interdisciplinary and multi-scalar perspective on the divergence of boundaries and risk change in the Anthropocene, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-15591, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15591, 2024.