EGU24-17082, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-17082
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Underestimation of desert dust ingested by aircraft from the CAMS reanalysis compared to CALIOP retrievals

Claire Ryder1, Clement Bezier2, Helen Dacre1, Rory Clarkson3, Vassilis Amiridis4, Eleni Marinou4, Emmanouil Proestakis4, Zak Kipling5, Angela Benedetti5, Mark Parrington5, Samuel Remy6, and Mark Vaughan7
Claire Ryder et al.
  • 1University of Reading, Department of Meteorology, Reading, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (c.l.ryder@reading.ac.uk)
  • 2Service des Avions Français instrumentés pour la Recherche en Environnement (SAFIRE), Météo-France, CNRS, CNES, Toulouse, France
  • 3Rolls-Royce plc, Derby, UK
  • 4National Observatory of Athens, IAASARS, Athens, 15236, Greece
  • 5ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, RG2 9AX, UK
  • 6Hygeos, Lille, France
  • 7NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA

Atmospheric mineral dust aerosol constitutes a threat to aircraft engines from deterioration of internal components. Here we fulfil an outstanding need to quantify engine dust ingestion at worldwide airports.  The vertical distribution of dust is of key importance since ascent/descent rates and engine power both vary with altitude and affect dust ingestion. We use representative jet engine power profile information combined with vertically and seasonally varying dust concentrations to calculate the ‘dust dose’ ingested by an engine over a single ascent or descent. Using the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) model reanalysis, we calculate climatological and seasonal dust dose at 10 airports for 2003-2019. Dust doses are mostly largest in summer for descent, with the largest at Delhi (6.6 g). Beijing’s largest dose occurs in spring (2.9 g). Holding patterns at altitudes coincident with peak dust concentrations can lead to substantial quantities of dust ingestion, resulting in a larger dose than the take-off, climb and taxi phases. We compare dust dose calculated from CAMS to spaceborne lidar observations from two dust datasets derived from the Cloud–Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP). In general, seasonal and spatial patterns are similar between CAMS and CALIOP though large variations in dose magnitude are found, with CAMS producing lower doses by a mean factor of 2.4±0.5, particularly when peak dust concentration is very close to the surface. We show that mitigating action to reduce engine dust damage could be achieved, firstly by moving arrivals and departures to after sunset and secondly by altering the altitude of the holding pattern away from that of the local dust peak altitude, reducing dust dose by up to 44% or 41% respectively.

How to cite: Ryder, C., Bezier, C., Dacre, H., Clarkson, R., Amiridis, V., Marinou, E., Proestakis, E., Kipling, Z., Benedetti, A., Parrington, M., Remy, S., and Vaughan, M.: Underestimation of desert dust ingested by aircraft from the CAMS reanalysis compared to CALIOP retrievals, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-17082, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-17082, 2024.