EGU24-1711, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1711
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Recognizing distinctiveness of SSP3-7.0 for use in impact assessments

Hideo Shiogama1, Shinichiro Fujimori2, Tomoko Hasegawa3, Michiya Hayashi1, Yukiko Hirabayashi4, Tomoo Ogura1, Toshichika Iizumi5, Kiyoshi Takahashi1, and Toshihiko Takemura6
Hideo Shiogama et al.
  • 1National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan (shiogama.hideo@nies.go.jp)
  • 2Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  • 3College of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
  • 4Department of Civil Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
  • 5Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan
  • 6Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Japan

Because recent mitigation efforts have made the upper-end scenario of the future GHG concentration (SSP5-8.5) highly unlikely, SSP3-7.0 has received attention as an alternative high-end scenario for impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (IAV) studies. However, the ‘distinctiveness’ of SSP3-7.0 may not be well-recognized by the IAV community. When the integrated assessment model (IAM) community developed the SSP-RCPs, they did not anticipate the limelight on SSP3-7.0 for IAV studies because SSP3-7.0 was the ‘distinctive’ scenario regarding to aerosol emissions (and land-use land cover changes). Aerosol emissions increase or change little in SSP3-7.0 due to the assumption of a lenient air quality policy, while they decrease in the other SSP-RCPs of CMIP6 and all the RCPs of CMIP5. This distinctive high-aerosol-emission design of SSP3-7.0 was intended to enable climate model (CM) researchers to investigate influences of extreme aerosol emissions on climate. Here we show that large aerosol emissions in SSP3-7.0 significantly suppress future increases in precipitation. We recommend IAV researchers to compare impact simulations at the same warming level between SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 to examine the effects of aerosols in the case that such analyses are adequate. We also recommend ScenarioMIP for CMIP7 to exclude scenarios with extreme policies of aerosols (and land-use land-cover changes) from Tier 1 experiments and instead include them in Tier 2.

 

Reference: Shiogama, H., et al. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 1276–1278 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01883-2

How to cite: Shiogama, H., Fujimori, S., Hasegawa, T., Hayashi, M., Hirabayashi, Y., Ogura, T., Iizumi, T., Takahashi, K., and Takemura, T.: Recognizing distinctiveness of SSP3-7.0 for use in impact assessments, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-1711, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1711, 2024.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material file

Comments on the supplementary material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

supplementary materials version 1 – uploaded on 16 Apr 2024, no comments

Post a comment