EGU24-1755, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1755
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Machine learning based pedotransfer function improves soil bulk density prediction but not for soil organic carbon stock

Songchao Chen1, Zhongxing Chen1, Xianglin Zhang2, Zhongkui Luo3, Calogero Schillaci4, Dominique Arrouays5, Anne Richer-de-Forges5, and Zhou Shi3
Songchao Chen et al.
  • 1ZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 311215, China (chensongchao@zju.edu.cn)
  • 2College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • 3UMR ECOSYS, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau 91120, France
  • 4European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra 21026, Italy
  • 5INRAE, Info&Sols, Orléans 45075, France

Being a fundamental indicator of soil health and quality, soil bulk density (BD) plays an important role in plant growth, nutrient availability, and water retention. Due to its limited availability of BD in databases, pedotransfer functions (PTFs) has been widely used in predicting BD, while the impact of PTFs’ accuracy on soil organic carbon (SOC) stock calculation has not been explored. Herein, we proposed a local modeling approach for predicting BD across EU and UK using LUCAS Soil 2018. Our approach involved a combination of neighbor sample search, Forward Recursive Feature Selection (FRFS) and Random Forest (RF) model (local-RFFRFS). The results showed that local-RFFRFS had a good performance in predicting BD (R2 of 0.58, RMSE of 0.19 g cm-3), surpassing the traditional PTFs (R2 of 0.40-0.45, RMSE of 0.22 g cm-3) and global PTFs using RF with and without FRFS (R2 of 0.56-0.57, RMSE of 0.19 g cm-3). Interestingly, we found the best traditional PTF (R2=0.84, RMSE=1.39 kg m-2) performed close to the local-RFFRFS (R2=0.85, RMSE=1.32 kg m-2) in SOC stock calculation using BD predictions. However, the local-RFFRFS still performed better (ΔR2>0.2 and ΔRMSE>0.1 g cm-3) for soil samples with low SOC stock (<3 kg m-2). Therefore, we suggest that the local-RFFRFS is a promising method for BD prediction while traditional PTFs would be more efficient when BD is subsequently utilized for calculating SOC stock.

How to cite: Chen, S., Chen, Z., Zhang, X., Luo, Z., Schillaci, C., Arrouays, D., Richer-de-Forges, A., and Shi, Z.: Machine learning based pedotransfer function improves soil bulk density prediction but not for soil organic carbon stock, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-1755, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1755, 2024.