Rock avalanche runout prediction for suggested failure scenarios. Case study of Cima del Simano rockslide (Switzerland)

Rock avalanches events pose significant concerns in mountainous regions characterised by deep and narrow valleys. This has not deterred the ongoing development in these areas, where population settlements and infrastructure continue to expand, becoming increasingly susceptible to these risks. Cima del Simano instability in the Swiss Alps, located in the narrow Blenio Valley, is a deep-seated rockslide which could trigger such events in the future. A previous work outlined several scenarios for the rockslide failure defined by a specific area, volume (ranging from 2.30x105 m3 to 4.30x106 m3), and susceptibility to happen.

Given the proximity of a major road and several villages on both sides of the Valley, there is a real need to evaluate the potential runout distance in the event of rupture and propagation of the different failure scenarios. 

Literature often presents two distinct approaches for estimating the runout distance and the impacted area, both based on the retrospective analysis of historical landslide occurrence. The first approach is through empirical equations linking volumes of failure V and Fahrböschung angles f (tanf=aV^(-b), with a and b two empirical parameters to determine). The second approach consists in numerically simulating the flow propagation by means of dedicated software and by applying specific rheological models. 

This present work suggests applying both those techniques to evaluate the area that would be affected in the case of a rock avalanche at Cima del Simano, triggered by one of the suggested scenarios. We evaluated the runout distance for different angles f estimated based on the empirical relationship, and Dan3D for simulating the propagation applying the Voellmy rheology. Four simulations were conducted by varying the friction coefficient μ [-] and the parameter of turbulence ξ [m.s-2] in order to assess the minimal and maximal possible propagation in terms of runout distance L and lateral spreading based on domain of validity of those parameters according to literature. 

The distances L obtained empirically are longer than the ones from the simulations. This can be explained by the frontal confinement of the flow slowing down the propagation. The study is completed by an evaluation for each scenario of the probability of exceeding a certain distance L using existing statistical models for f variations. 

Additionally, the numerical simulations highlight the areas in gullies where debris are deposited during the flow propagation. Those areas can be sources for subsequent debris flow events. In a second step, we conducted an analysis of areas susceptible to debris flow with Flow-R and compared them with former debris flow events for validation. 

This study aligns with risk management to assist in making informed decisions regarding the evacuation plan in the event of a rupture and propagation of an important volume at Cima del Simano.