Strong (Mw>6.0) earthquakes along the KTFZ: implications for recurrence pattern and seismic coupling

The Kefalonia Transform Fault Zone (KTFZ) in central Ionian Islands (Kefalonia and Lefkada Islands), Greece, exhibits the fastest rates of relative plate motion in the Mediterranean. It constitutes an active boundary and comprises five manor fault segments with a total length of nearly 120km, and are characterized by fast long–term rates of displacements of about ~25mm/yr for Kefalonia segments and ~15 mm/yr for Lefkada segments. Strike slip faulting with moment magnitudes M_w up to 7.0 characterizes the largest earthquakes, whereas the five almost along strike faults have been the sites of numerous earthquakes of moment magnitude, M_w, 5.0–7.0 during the past 50 years. The KTFZ in its entire length is much more active at the M_w>6.0 level than a comparable length of either the North Aegean Trough or Corinth rift, which are the most fastly deforming areas in the area of Greece. Alteration of active periods comprising multiple earthquakes with much longer quiescent periods is the mode of strong earthquake occurrence, with prevailing clustering over the period when historical information is available. The fast rate of plate motion, maximum size of earthquakes and relatively short repeat times make these fault segments suitable to seek for recurrence behavior that approaches quasi–periodic and its potential implications to the cyclic mode of seismogenesis. Recurrence of M6.0 earthquakes along nearly the same fault segment is attempted after evaluating the location of the historical events, based on all available macroseismic descriptions. These estimations are then compared with computed simulated catalogs.

The computed depths of earthquakes along the KTFZ are accurate enough to ascertain centroid depths as indicators of the downdip width of seismic faulting. With aftershock relocation we constrained the seismogenic layer in Kefalonia and Lefkada segments equal to 14 km (between depths of 3 and 17 km) and 10 km (between depths of 5 and 15 km) respectively, corresponding to downdip widths of 19 and 12 km, respectively. We compared these constraints with the calculated downdip width from a segment’s length along strike, moment release and relative plate motion ‘assuming’ full seismic coupling. The good correlation between the two support the high degree of coupling along the KTFZ.

Acknowledgments: Funded by the European Union. Views and opions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Commission – Euratom. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.