EGU24-19469, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19469
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Global Performance Assessment of 20+ Precipitation Products Using Radar Data and Gauge Observations

Xuetong Wang1, Hylke Beck1, and Raied Alharbi2,3,4
Xuetong Wang et al.
  • 1Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
  • 2Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 3General Directorate of Water Resources, Ministry of Environment, Water, and Agriculture (MEWA), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • 4United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Accurate precipitation (P) estimates are crucial for a wide range of applications, including water resource management, disaster risk reduction, agricultural planning, and infrastructure development. Over the past few decades, numerous gridded P products have been developed, with varying temporal and spatial resolutions, derived from diverse data sources, and employing different methodologies and algorithms. However, these products frequently exhibit significant uncertainties, errors, and biases, underscoring the importance of selecting the most suitable product for each application. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of over 20 freely available global gridded P products. We used the European RADar CLIMatology (EURADCLIM) gauge-radar dataset, the US Stage-IV gauge-radar product, and observations from approximately 20,000 global stations as ground truth. Our assessment included several new products, such as PDIR-Now and GPM+SM2RAIN, as well as an experimental Random Forest (RF) model, a potential new version of the Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) product. For the assessment, we employed a broad range of performance metrics sensitive to various aspects of P time series, including the versatile Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) and its components (correlation, bias, and variability), as well as the Critical Success Index (CSI), wet day bias, peak bias, and trend error. Additionally, we assessed the relative performance in different physiographic regions, seasons, and P regimes, and among various product types (satellite, (re)analysis, gauge, and combinations thereof). The RF model showed the best overall performance, achieving a mean CSI of 0.42. In comparison, the current MSWEP version, CHIRP, ERA5, GSMaP and IMERG achieved mean CSI values of 0.40, 0.21, 0.36, 0.32, and 0.32, respectively. Our study highlights the stark differences in performance among various state-of-the-art P products and provides a baseline for the development of new machine learning-based P products.

How to cite: Wang, X., Beck, H., and Alharbi, R.: Global Performance Assessment of 20+ Precipitation Products Using Radar Data and Gauge Observations, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-19469, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19469, 2024.