EGU24-2967, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2967
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Afterslip and viscous relaxation on the postseismic deformation following the M8.2 Chignik, Alaska earthquake 

Peiyu Dong and Bin Zhao
Peiyu Dong and Bin Zhao
  • Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Wuhan, China

We have developed a 3D viscoelastic finite element model to study processes that control the postseismic deformation due to the 2021 M8.2 Chignik, Alaska earthquake. Our model employs a bi-viscous Burgers rheology to represent the viscoelastic relaxation of the upper mantle and the first two years GPS data after Chignik event as constraints.

Initially, we investigated the viscoelastic relaxation mechanism and stress-driven afterslip mechanisms individually. We then attempted to reconcile their contributions by assessing the misfit between observed and simulated displacements. And, it is assumed that the afterslip evolution is governed by rate-strengthening friction. The results show that there exists a substantial misfit between the simulated and the observed value of the optimal model under the viscoelastic relaxation mechanism. Notably, at one observation site in the near-field, the observed displacement exceeds 200 mm, whereas the simulated value only less than 5 mm. Similarly, the optimal solution of simulated value under the afterslip mechanism does not align well with the observed value. Furthermore, we also utilized different frictional properties on updip (0-40 km) and downdip (40-100 km) regions of the coseismic rupture. The preferred misfit in this model is lower than that obtained using the model with a uniform friction parameter, but there is still a discrepancy between the simulated and observed values. These results indicate that neither the afterslip nor viscoelastic relaxation mechanisms alone can fully explain the total postseismic deformation.

Subsequently, we utilized an integrated model to simultaneously extract the contributions from both mechanisms. The combined modeling results indicate that the near-field postseismic displacements are dominated by both mechanisms together. However, in the far-field, deformation is primarily controlled by afterslip, with minimal influence from the viscoelastic relaxation mechanism. The inferred frictional properties on the updip and downdip regions of the coseismic rupture exhibit significant differences, which likely reflect variations in fault zone materials at different depths. And the optimal model supports a viscoelastic rheology for the continent mantle, with a steady-state viscosity is 1×1019Pa•s and the transient viscosity is 1×1018Pa•s. 

How to cite: Dong, P. and Zhao, B.: Afterslip and viscous relaxation on the postseismic deformation following the M8.2 Chignik, Alaska earthquake , EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-2967, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2967, 2024.