EGU24-6550, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6550
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Stable silicon isotope signatures reflect the storage and flow paths of fluid draining through both mesoscale hillslopes and natural watersheds.

Andrew Guertin1, Charlie Cunningham2, Julien Bouchez3, Marine Gelin3, Jon Chorover2, Peter Troch4, Hannes Bauser5, Minseok Kim6, Louis Derry3,7, and Jennifer Druhan1,3
Andrew Guertin et al.
  • 1Univiversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Earth Science and Environmental Change, Urbana, United States of America
  • 2University of Arizona, Department of Environmental Science, Tucson, United States of America
  • 3Institut de Pysique du Globe de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
  • 4University of Arizona, Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, Tucson, United States of America
  • 5University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Department of Geoscience, Las Vegas, United States of America
  • 6Pusan National University, Department of Civil Engineering, Busan, South Korea
  • 7Cornell University, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Ithaca, United States of America

The variety of transit times and pathways water takes from infiltration to discharge through a hillslope determines the dynamic storage of the system, the capacity for water-rock-life reactivity, and ultimately the chemical composition of streamflow. In the laboratory, fluid phase stable Si isotopes (δ30Si) enrich through time during secondary silicate mineral formation as Si is removed from solution1. However, despite streams being weighted towards young waters, discharge from individual catchments commonly maintains a stable, often strongly fractionated δ30Si signature, reflective of chemically evolved solute signatures2. Furthermore, each individual catchment exhibits its own characteristic δ30Si signature in the stream discharge, even for comparable extents of Si depletion from solution. Such intra-site variability was attributed to a combination of multiple fractionation pathways (plant uptake and mineral precipitation) and the unique structure of fluid storage and drainage through each catchment. Here, we use three replicate artificial hillslopes at the Landscape Evolution Observatory (LEO) in Tucson, Arizona as model catchments to test if δ30Si of discharge can be described by an isotope-enabled reactive transport model (RTM) constrained by both the characteristic transit time distribution (TTD) and fractionation pathways of LEO. At the LEO hillslopes, the role of vegetation and hence the compounding effects of ecosystem cycling can be omitted, limiting δ30Si fractionation solely to the effects of mineral precipitation. We collected samples, with constrained TTDs, and measured δ30Si from the discharge at the outlet of each hillslope during three randomized storm events of varying intensity. The δ30Si in aqueous discharge reflects a clear and consistent signature of fractionation that is confined to a narrow range of values, much like natural upland watersheds, despite highly variable irrigation scenarios, retaining a signature across the three hillslopes defined by the unique hydrologic flow paths of the replicated system.  We offer a quantitative and process-based framework describing these observations using an isotope-enabled RTM3. Close agreement between this coupled RTM and the discharge measurements from LEO supports our hypothesis that the δ30Si of headwater streams is reflective of both characteristic watershed TTDs and fractionation pathways. By applying this new understanding to reexamine upland watershed datasets we can gain insight into fluid flow paths and contributions of various fractionation pathways to water circulation through the shallow subsurface Critical Zone.

 

1Fernandez, N. M., Zhang, X., & Druhan, J. L. (2019). Silicon isotopic re-equilibration during amorphous silica precipitation and implications for isotopic signatures in geochemical proxies. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 262, 104-127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.07.029

2Fernandez, N. M., Bouchez, J., Derry, L. A., Chorover, J., Gaillardet, J., Giesbrecht, I., et al. (2022). Resiliency of silica export signatures when low order streams are subject to storm events. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 127, e2021JG006660. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006660

3Druhan, J. L., & Benettin, P. (2023). Isotope Ratio – Discharge Relationships of Solutes Derived From Weathering Reactions. American Journal of Science, 323. https://doi.org/10.2475/001c.84469

How to cite: Guertin, A., Cunningham, C., Bouchez, J., Gelin, M., Chorover, J., Troch, P., Bauser, H., Kim, M., Derry, L., and Druhan, J.: Stable silicon isotope signatures reflect the storage and flow paths of fluid draining through both mesoscale hillslopes and natural watersheds., EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-6550, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6550, 2024.