EGU24-7830, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-7830
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Developing Best Practices in Tidal Analysis

Andrew Matthews1 and the IAPSO Tidal Analysis Best Practice Study Group*
Andrew Matthews and the IAPSO Tidal Analysis Best Practice Study Group
  • 1National Oceanography Centre, Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (antt@noc.ac.uk)
  • *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract

The tide is generally the dominant component of a sea level record in many parts of the world and its analysis has therefore been a central part of oceanography for hundreds of years. Methods to predict the tide have changed over time, but have largely converged on the classical harmonic method, which is based on the principle that a series of tidal observations may be decomposed into a finite number of sinusoidal functions, known as tidal constituents, with angular speeds related to known astronomical frequencies.

Classical harmonic analysis is usually carried out using one of a number of software packages made available by scientists and oceanographic institutions. These are exceptionally useful, but within them they encode a series of assumptions and decisions that need to be made in order to carry out an analysis, including:

  • What is an appropriate set of constituents to use in a location, given the data available and the hydrodynamics of the area?
  • How does the analysis account for variations of the tidal constituents over time, for example over the nodal cycle?
  • How will our results be affected by non-tidal influences?

Furthermore, other approaches will be more successful in particular environments, for example in shallow waters when the tidal curve can be highly non-symmetric.

Non-experts in tidal science are often unaware of the options available, and the consequence of making the wrong decision. Furthermore, this knowledge is developed as rules-of-thumb within organisations based on many years of experience, so is not readily accessible. As a result, there is a need for some internationally agreed recommendations.

We recently held a tidal analysis workshop to discuss these matters, funded by the International Association for the Physical Sciences of the Oceans (IAPSO) as one of their Best Practice Study Groups. Here we present some illustrations of the issues mentioned above, along with some of our suggested approaches.

The best practice document is currently being drafted based on discussions held at the workshop, and when completed will be submitted to the International Oceanographic Commission’s best practice system (https://www.oceanbestpractices.org/).

IAPSO Tidal Analysis Best Practice Study Group:

Bernardo Aliaga (UNESCO Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission), Colin Bell (NOC, UK), Andreas Boesch (BSH, Germany), Hilde Sande Borck, (Norwegian Mapping Authority, Norway), Andy Broderick (NOC, UK), Adam Devlin (University of Hawai'i at Manoa, USA), Catia Domingues, (NOC, UK), Greg Dusek (NOAA, USA), Lisa Eastwood (NOC, UK), Ayesha Genz (NOAA, USA), Pieter Gurdebeke (AMDK, Belgium), Michael Hart-Davis (DGFI-TUM, Germany), Angela Hibbert (NOC, UK), Zarina Jayaswal (Australian Hydrographic Office, Australia), Chris Jones (UKHO, UK), Chanmi Kim (NOC, UK), Jue Lin-Ye (Nologin Ocean Weather Systems, Spain), Phillip Macaulay (Canadian Hydrographic Service, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada), Gerard McCarthy (Maynooth University, Ireland), Constantinos Matsoukis (NOC, UK), Gary Mitchum (University of South Florida, USA), George Mungov (NOAA, USA), Fernando Oreiro (Servicio de Hidrografía Naval / Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina), Begoña Pérez Gómez (Puertos del Estado, Spain), Jeff Polton (NOC, UK), Tom Prime (NOC, UK), Layton Quinton, (NOC, UK), Fabio Raicich (CNR, Italy), Richard Ray (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA), Linta Rose (UHSLC, USA), Colin Shepherd (UKHO, UK), Peter Stone (NOAA, USA), Laurent Testut (LIENSs, France), Matthew Widlansky (UHSLC, USA), Joanne Williams (NOC, UK), Simon Williams (NOC, UK), Philip Woodworth (NOC, UK)

How to cite: Matthews, A. and the IAPSO Tidal Analysis Best Practice Study Group: Developing Best Practices in Tidal Analysis, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-7830, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-7830, 2024.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material file

Comments on the supplementary material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

supplementary materials version 1 – uploaded on 11 Apr 2024
  • CC1: Comment on EGU24-7830, Joanne Williams, 12 Apr 2024

    Thanks Andy! Let's see if anyone is tempted to give some feedback...

    • CC2: Reply to CC1, Laurent Testut, 15 Apr 2024

      Very nice poster, simple and informative !! well done (Laurent)