EGU24-988, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-988
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Opportunistic Model Intercomparison of the Miocene Ocean Circulation – MioMIP1

Trusha Naik1,2, Agatha de Boer1,2, Helen Coxall1,2, Natalie Burls3, Catherine Bradshaw4,5, Yannick Donnadieu6, Alexander Farnsworth7, Amanda Frigola8, Nicholas Herold9, Matthew Huber10, Pasha Karami11, Gregor Knorr12, Allegra LeGrande13,14, Daniel Lunt7, Matthias Prange8, and Yurui Zhang15
Trusha Naik et al.
  • 1Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden (trusha.naik@geo.su.se)
  • 2Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Earth Sciences, Center for Ocean-Land Atmosphere Studies, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
  • 4Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
  • 5The Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • 6Aix Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, Coll France, INRA, CEREGE, Aix en Provence, France
  • 7School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • 8MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  • 9Science Division, The NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, Climate and Atmospheric Science, Parramatta, NSW, Australia
  • 10Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
  • 11Rossby Centre, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden
  • 12Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
  • 13NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
  • 14Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
  • 15State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean & Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

During the Miocene epoch (~23-5 Ma), the Earth experienced a notably warmer climate, with global surface temperatures ranging approximately 4°C to 8°C higher than pre-industrial levels, accompanied by atmospheric CO2 concentrations in the range of 400-800 ppm. Throughout this period, tropical ocean gateways underwent constriction or closure, while high-latitude gateways expanded. These developments likely played a pivotal role in shaping the modern ocean circulation structure, with strong bipolar hemispheric overturning in the Atlantic, although the precise mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study explores Miocene ocean circulation through an opportunistic climate model intercomparison (MioMIP1), encompassing 14 simulations that use different paleogeographies, CO2 levels, and vegetation distributions. A consistent feature across all models is the fresher-than-modern Arctic and a resulting increased freshwater export to the North Atlantic. Consequently, the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) appears markedly weaker than its modern counterpart in all simulations, ranging from approximately 1 to 16 Sv. However, there is no discernible correlation between the transport of Arctic freshwater to the Atlantic and the strength of the AMOC across the simulations. Similarly, contrary to earlier suggestions, our analysis reveals that neither Panama nor the Tethys gateway exerts a consistent impact on circulation across the simulations. This implies that the influence of these three straits on circulation dynamics also depends on other factors such as background palaeogeography, CO2 levels, vegetation, or model physics and requires further study. In three out of the 13 simulations, deep overturning in the North Pacific (PMOC) is observed, ranging from approximately 5 to 10 Sv. Notably, in the North Atlantic, the simulations with a higher salinity have a stronger AMOC, and although this is not observed as distinctly in the North Pacific, the simulations with a PMOC exhibit a reduced salinity contrast between the North Pacific and North Atlantic and highlight the salinity feedback in play. A proto-AMOC appears to be developing in most of the simulations, albeit weak. This indicates that while the AMOC began to take shape during the Miocene, it likely attained its modern strength during the late Miocene.

How to cite: Naik, T., de Boer, A., Coxall, H., Burls, N., Bradshaw, C., Donnadieu, Y., Farnsworth, A., Frigola, A., Herold, N., Huber, M., Karami, P., Knorr, G., LeGrande, A., Lunt, D., Prange, M., and Zhang, Y.: Opportunistic Model Intercomparison of the Miocene Ocean Circulation – MioMIP1, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-988, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-988, 2024.

Comments on the supplementary material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

supplementary materials version 1 – uploaded on 14 Apr 2024, no comments