ST2.5 | Particle Precipitation: Drivers, Properties, and Impacts on Atmosphere, Ionosphere, Magnetosphere Coupling
EDI
Particle Precipitation: Drivers, Properties, and Impacts on Atmosphere, Ionosphere, Magnetosphere Coupling
Convener: Hilde Nesse | Co-conveners: Aaron Breneman, Alexa Halford, Antti SalminenECSECS, Kyle Murphy
Orals
| Tue, 16 Apr, 08:30–10:15 (CEST)
 
Room 0.16
Posters on site
| Attendance Wed, 17 Apr, 10:45–12:30 (CEST) | Display Wed, 17 Apr, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X3
Orals |
Tue, 08:30
Wed, 10:45
Precipitation of particles into planetary atmospheres is a fundamental heliophysics process, driven by dynamic processes on the sun, in the solar wind, and within planetary magnetospheres. At Earth, precipitation transfers energy from the solar wind and magnetosphere into the ionosphere and upper atmosphere. This dynamic coupling between plasma regimes leads to a variety of impacts on the upper atmosphere; from vibrant auroral displays, to generation of ionospheric current systems, and impacts on satellite infrastructure through increased satellite drag. This session takes a system-science perspective on particle precipitation across wide ranging energies and impacts on the atmosphere. We invite presentations which focus on links between the drivers and their relative importance in generating particle precipitation; the spatiotemporal dynamics of large-scale processes such as solar wind structure of geomagnetic storm phase; and the impacts of particle precipitation on atmospheric conductivity, chemistry, and dynamics.

Orals: Tue, 16 Apr | Room 0.16

Chairpersons: Hilde Nesse, Antti Salminen, Alexa Halford
08:30–08:35
08:35–08:45
|
EGU24-12857
|
solicited
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
Louis Ozeke, Ian Mann, Leon Olifer, Suman Chakraborty, and Joshua Pettit

Energetic particle precipitation into the atmosphere has been identified as a key loss process for electrons in the Earth’s outer radiation belt region. However, direct measurements of the electron flux precipitating into the atmosphere are challenging from high altitude low inclination spacecraft, such as the Van Allen Probes, due to the small angular size of the loss cone along the orbital path of these high-altitude spacecraft. Here we use data from the Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellites (POES)/Space Environment Monitor in low Earth orbit to assess the relationship between the trapped and precipitating electron flux in integral energy channels >30 keV, >100 keV, and >300 keV. Our results highlight that there is a strong non-linear relationship between the flux of trapped and precipitating electrons, with the ratio of precipitating to trapped flux only becoming significantly enhanced once the trapped flux reaches a critical level. This transition from low to high levels of precipitation is consistent with the theory proposed by Kennel and Petschek (K-P) (1966) https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ071i001p00001, whereby intense chorus waves are excited and trigger pitch angle diffusion, resulting in energetic particle precipitation and limiting the trapped flux. Using electron flux data from POES and chorus wave data from the Van Allen Probes, we further test the observations against predictions from the K-P theory. A particle tracing model is also utilized to illustrate a direct link between the drift paths of injected electrons, the occurrence of chorus waves and the spatial distribution of strong electron precipitation into the atmosphere at different energies.

How to cite: Ozeke, L., Mann, I., Olifer, L., Chakraborty, S., and Pettit, J.: The Relationship Between Electron Precipitation and the Population of Trapped Electrons in LEO: New Evidence Supporting a Natural Limit to the Flux of Energetic Electrons, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-12857, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-12857, 2024.

08:45–08:55
|
EGU24-15761
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Mikko Savola, Adnane Osmane, Lucile Turc, Emilia Kilpua, and Minna Palmrooth

The outer Van Allen belt is home to relativistic electrons and experience large variations in electron fluxes during geomagnetic driving events. Many satellite orbits, especially geostationary ones, overlap with the radiation belts and experience high-energy electron radiation. This radiation causes surface and internal charging, accompanied by aging of satellite components. In order to determine the impact on satellites during strong and extreme geomagnetic storms, one needs to quantify the magnitude of the fluxes. In this communication, we compare two different methods for estimating large flux values at geostationary orbit. The first method is physical and relies on the Kennel-Petschek limit (Kennel&Petschek, 1966). The second method is purely statistical and originates in extreme value theory (Coles, 2001). Using extreme value theory (EVT), for electron energies of 130 keV, we find for the once in 150 years electron flux an expected value that is two orders of magnitude larger than electron flux during the Halloween storm of 2003. On the other hand, the Kennel-Petschek limit, for the 130 keV electrons at L=6.7, which corresponds to geostationary orbit, is 1/6 of the maximum of the Halloween storm flux. The EVT therefore provides much larger estimates than the Kennel-Petschek limit. We compare the two methodologies with their respective strengths and limitations and determine under which conditions they should be combined to estimate extreme fluxes in the radiation belts. 

How to cite: Savola, M., Osmane, A., Turc, L., Kilpua, E., and Palmrooth, M.: Estimation of extreme electron fluxes at geostationary orbit: a statistical and a physical approach, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-15761, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15761, 2024.

08:55–09:05
|
EGU24-3260
|
On-site presentation
Jean Berchem, Simon Wing, and C. Philippe Escoubet

Most studies of the geoeffectiveness of the solar wind tend to focus on coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and Corotating Interactive Regions (CIRs). By comparison, fewer studies focus on the geoeffectiveness of the solar wind directional discontinuities (DD), either tangential discontinuity (TD) or rotational discontinuity (RD).  We present two examples of solar wind DD interaction with the magnetosphere that lead to complex dayside particle precipitation structures even though the geomagnetic activities remain quiet in those two events.  In the first example, the DD leads to the formations of unusual boundary layer, overlapping mantle, and double cusp as observed by the DMSP spacecraft. The double cusp signature is consistent with simultaneous magnetic reconnection occurring at both low and high latitudes due to the dominant IMF By as confirmed in a global MHD simulation for the event. The existence of a high-latitude reconnection in this even is also supported by Cluster C2, which observes velocity fluctuations and reversals with peak-to-peak amplitudes >800 km s–1 as C2 crosses the magnetopause.  Guided by the MHD simulation, the Cluster observation can be interpreted as the spacecraft crossing reconnection outflows while moving from one side of the X-line to the other.  In the second example, the DD leads to the unusual particle precipitation structure where three distinct ion populations can be found on the same magnetic field line.  These three populations have energies of a few hundreds eVs, a few keVs, and a few tens of keVs, suggesting that ions originating from the magnetosphere, solar wind, and ionosphere, respectively, can coexist on the same field line unthermalized.  Moreover, this unusual particle precipitation region has a spatio-temporal scale of about 1 min or 500 km in the ionosphere.

How to cite: Berchem, J., Wing, S., and Escoubet, C. P.: Complex dayside particle precipitation observed during the passage of solar wind discontinuities  , EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-3260, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-3260, 2024.

09:05–09:15
|
EGU24-6589
|
Virtual presentation
The Magnetosphere Aurora Reconnection Boundary Layer Explorer (MARBLE):  Understanding How Magnetic Reconnection Generates the Aurora
(withdrawn)
John Dorelli and Christopher Bard
09:15–09:25
|
EGU24-6932
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Dibyendu Sur, John C. Dorelli, Mei-Ching Fok, and Natalia Y. Buzulukova

The Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Model (CIMI) is designed by coupling the Comprehensive Ring Current Model (CRCM) and the Radiation Belt Environment (RBE) model (Fok et al., Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 119, 2014). The model provides electron and ion distribution functions in Earth’s radiation belt, ring current, estimates energies of precipitated electrons and ions in the ionosphere, calculates plasmaspheric density, ionospheric height-integrated Hall and Pedersen conductivities, ionospheric convection potentials. An important feature of CIMI model is calculation of electron precipitation from diffusion-convection equation that accounts both for particle drift in the inner magnetosphere and wave-particle interactions through various plasma waves. In this paper, the performance of the CIMI in terms of precipitating particle energy distribution is evaluated during the geomagnetic disturbed period of May 31 – June 1, 2013 (minimum Dst = -124nT). The performance of CIMI is observed in correspondence with Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellite observations. Precipitated electrons (30 keV > E > 500eV) from Earth’s plasma sheet go through wave-particle interactions and produce diffuse aurora, that can be simulated with CIMI model. We compare CIMI electron precipitation energy channels for DMSP energy bins and analyze CIMI performance for different energy bins, mean energy and for the total integrated energy flux. In addition, CIMI model has different options for ionospheric conductance model: 1) empirical model of Hardy et al. (Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 92, 1987) that depends on Kp-index, and 2) Robinson's formulation (Robinson et al., Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 92, 1987) where ionospheric conductance depends on electron precipitation mean energy and total energy flux. We study CIMI model performance for two different models of ionospheric conductance and evaluate the feedback of electron precipitation on the ring current and ionospheric electric field.

How to cite: Sur, D., Dorelli, J. C., Fok, M.-C., and Buzulukova, N. Y.: Performance Assessment of CIMI Electron Precipitation During Geomagnetic Storm, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-6932, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6932, 2024.

09:25–09:35
|
EGU24-4781
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Dong Lin, Shanshan Bao, Wenbin Wang, Viacheslav Merkin, Kareem Sorathia, William Lotko, Dedong Wang, Kevin Pham, Qianli Ma, Thomas Sotirelis, Xueling Shi, Adam Michael, Anthony Sciola, Michael Wiltberger, Frank Toffoletto, John Lyon, and Jeffrey Garretson

Auroral precipitation plays an important role in the magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere (MIT) coupling. Various precipitation spectra have been observed and they are driven by different physical mechanisms. In this study, we report the Dragon King model which is used to characterize auroral precipitation and its consequent ionospheric conductance in the Multiscale Atmosphere-Geospace Environment (MAGE) model, a newly developed whole geospace model. Mono-energetic electron precipitation is derived from large-scale field-aligned currents and drift-physics informed loss cone rate, using the linearized Fridman-Lemaire relation. Diffuse electron precipitation is derived with a drift-physics based ring current model, in which electron lifetime due to interactions with chorus and hiss waves is obtained with an empirical table and electron loss rate is informed by drift physics and IGRF magnetic field. Broadband electron precipitation is derived from a statistical relationship between field-aligned Alfvénic Poynting flux and the precipitation energy flux and number flux. The Dragon King model is validated from different perspectives with various observational data, including the statistical pattern during different categories of solar wind driving conditions, and along-trajectory comparison with satellite measurements. The Dragon King model is further used to understand the drivers of different precipitation and their relative importance with MAGE simulations.

How to cite: Lin, D., Bao, S., Wang, W., Merkin, V., Sorathia, K., Lotko, W., Wang, D., Pham, K., Ma, Q., Sotirelis, T., Shi, X., Michael, A., Sciola, A., Wiltberger, M., Toffoletto, F., Lyon, J., and Garretson, J.: Characterizing auroral precipitation and ionospheric conductance with the Dragon King model in MAGE, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-4781, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-4781, 2024.

09:35–09:45
|
EGU24-3868
|
On-site presentation
Bin Li

Based on the multi-scale statistical observations from antarctic Zhongshan station, a rippling aurora-like optical phenomena was observed near the poleward boundary of the aurora. The lack of red emission and extremely small scale indicated the aurora ripple is not likely been the result of the electron or ion perception along the magnetic field line. Through the statistical results of appearance location, fine scale structures and the consistence to the theoretical predication, the Aurora ripple is believed to be mainly caused by the plasma gradient drift instability around aurora. Dreyer et al described this phenomena as Fragmented aurora-like emissions in 2019, considering the patterns of emergence and progression associated with this phenomenon, we suggest to name it as "Aurora ripples". This designation is inspired by the visual resemblance of the phenomenon to rippless formed when a paddle moves through a lake, signifying the interaction of auroral plasma with the atmosphere.

How to cite: Li, B.: Aurora ripples - a visual ionospheric emissions when auroral plasma sweeping through atmosphere, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-3868, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-3868, 2024.

09:45–09:55
|
EGU24-8910
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
Pavle Arsenovic, Eugene Rozanov, Ilya Usoskin, Chris Turney, Timofei Sukhodolov, Ken McCracken, Marina Friedel, Julien Anet, Stana Simic, Ville Maliniemi, Tatiana Egorova, Monika Korte, Harald Rieder, Alan Cooper, and Thomas Peter

Solar particle events (SPEs) are short-lived bursts of high-energy particles from the solar atmosphere and are widely recognized as posing significant economic risks to modern society. Most SPEs are relatively weak and have minor impacts on the Earth’s environment but historic records contain much stronger SPEs which have the potential to alter atmospheric chemistry, impacting climate and biological life. The impacts of such strong SPEs would be far more severe when the Earth’s protective geomagnetic field weakened, such as during past geomagnetic excursions or reversals. Here we model the impacts of an extreme SPE under different geomagnetic field strengths, focusing on changes in atmospheric chemistry and surface radiation using the atmosphere-ocean-chemistry-climate model SOCOL3-MPIOM and the radiation transfer model LibRadtran. Under current geomagnetic conditions, an extreme SPE would increase NOx concentrations in the polar stratosphere and mesosphere, causing reductions in extratropical stratospheric ozone lasting for about a year. In contrast, with no geomagnetic field there would be a substantial increase in NOx throughout the entire atmosphere, resulting in severe stratospheric ozone depletion for several years. The resulting ground-level UV radiation would remain elevated for up to six years, leading to increases in UV index up to 20-25% and solar-induced DNA damage rates by 40-50%. The potential evolutionary impacts of past extreme SPEs remains an important question, while the risks they pose to human health in modern conditions continue to be underestimated.

How to cite: Arsenovic, P., Rozanov, E., Usoskin, I., Turney, C., Sukhodolov, T., McCracken, K., Friedel, M., Anet, J., Simic, S., Maliniemi, V., Egorova, T., Korte, M., Rieder, H., Cooper, A., and Peter, T.: Global impacts of an extreme Solar Particle Event under different geomagnetic field strengths, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-8910, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-8910, 2024.

09:55–10:05
|
EGU24-15929
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
Robert Rankin, Dmytro Sydorenko, Jun Liang, and Eric Donovan

The SMILE mission, supported by the European Space Agency and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, is scheduled for launch in 2024. The mission is augmented by a substantial ground-based network of optical ASI's. Here, we report  progress in developing a numerical model of UV emissions to aid interpretation of images collected by the SMILE UVI.  The model calculates UV emissions produced by suprathermal electrons, accounting for prominent UV auroral and dayglow emission lines and bands, including OI 130.4/135.6nm, Lyman-Birge-Hopfield (LBH) and Vegard-Kaplan (VK) bands. It also calculates line-of-sight absorption and the integrated UV photon flux spectrum reaching each UVI-imager pixel. Photoelectron energy spectra for the UV emission module are generated using a Monte Carlo model of photoelectron propagation. This model accounts for 52 kinds of electron-neutral collisions as well as Coulomb collisions. Considering closed geomagnetic field lines in the night sector, and depending on Earth's position relative to the Sun, the model predicts the appearance of energetic photoelectrons coming from the day sector. Coulomb scattering prevents pthese hotoelectrons from reaching the opposite ionosphere [c.f., Khazanov et al, 1994]. To reveal the importance of Coulomb collisions, model photoelectron fluxes and related UV emissions were calculated with Coulomb collisions included and omitted for five locations along the orbit of the DMSP F16 satellite on UT0800 January 1, 2017, which observed anomalous UV emission induced by conjugate photoelectrons [Kil et al., 2020]. Omitting Coulomb collisions overestimates the photoelectron flux and the intensity of UV emission by up to 50% with the effect being more pronounced on longer field lines.

Solar EUV photons also produce energetic photoelectrons which ionize neutrals, heat ambient electrons, and cause UV emission. These photoelectrons can penetrate into the nightside even when connected to the day sector by geomagnetic field lines. UV emission caused by such photoelectrons in the night sector is called anomalous UV emission. knowlege of which is important for the analysis of data from the SMILE UVI. The model development for SMILE includes a module that calculates propagation of photoelectrons and related UV emission. Results from the model are benchmarked against observations by the Special Sensor Ultraviolet Spectrographic Imager (SSUSI) of the DMSP F16 spacecraft. The spacecraft was in Earths shadow, and traveling towards the equatorial plane. The observed anomalous UV emission rapidly decreases as the spacecraft approaches lower latitudes where field lines are shorter and almost completely in the shadow. Values of the UV emission at wavelengths of 135.6 nm and 130.4 nm were calculated from the model at several locations along the spacecraft orbit. Calculations performed with a tilted dipole geomagnetic field gave values that were significantly larger than the observed ones. Calculations using the International Reference Geomagnetic Field (IGRF) provided much improved agreement between the model and the observation because the IGRF places the southern ends of geomagnetic field lines farther from the sunlit hemisphere. The improved agreement suggests the model development related to the SMILE mission will aid interpretation of the data.

How to cite: Rankin, R., Sydorenko, D., Liang, J., and Donovan, E.: Calculation of photoelectron induced UV emission with application to the SMILE mission, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-15929, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15929, 2024.

10:05–10:15
|
EGU24-13357
|
Virtual presentation
Forbush Decreases and the Global Electric Circuit
(withdrawn)
Gang Li and Jose Tacza

Posters on site: Wed, 17 Apr, 10:45–12:30 | Hall X3

Display time: Wed, 17 Apr, 08:30–Wed, 17 Apr, 12:30
Chairpersons: Hilde Nesse, Antti Salminen, Alexa Halford
X3.14
|
EGU24-3612
|
ECS
|
Teresa Esman, Alexa Halford, Joshua Pettit, Remya Bhanu, and Sadie Elliot

Electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves are waves generated through cyclotron instability and propagate at frequencies near the ion cyclotron frequency. These waves are frequent during geomagnetic storms and significantly impact the dynamics of particles in the magnetosphere. Wave-particle interaction can lead to the acceleration and scattering of charged particles. Therefore, the presence of these precipitating particles may indicate the presence of EMIC waves. However, other processes are known to also cause precipitation, such as ULF waves. 

By examining in situ data during POES and Van Allen Probe conjunctions, characteristics of the plasmasphere, magnetosphere, particle fluxes, and EMIC waves are investigated. We conduct a statistical analysis of particle flux under varying conditional limitations associated with the presence or lack of EMIC waves and geomagnetic storms. We use the two sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to check multiple null hypotheses and aim to answer increasingly more complex questions as we test our methods and follow assumptions. 

Preliminary results showed a statistical difference between the particle flux observed when there are EMIC waves and when there are no EMIC waves during storm times. We discuss new results, possible implications, and next steps.

How to cite: Esman, T., Halford, A., Pettit, J., Bhanu, R., and Elliot, S.: Statistical Analysis of EMIC waves and Particle Fluxes using POES and Van Allen Probes, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-3612, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-3612, 2024.

X3.15
|
EGU24-7379
|
Yuto Katoh, Paul Rosendahl, Yasunobu Ogawa, Yasutaka Hiraki, and Hiroyasu Tadokoro

We numerically evaluate the role of the mirror force on the collision rate due to the relativistic electron precipitation into the ionosphere. We compute the motion of individual precipitating electrons with the mirror force, considering collisions with neutral gas by the Monte Carlo method. We examine the effect of the mirror force on the altitude profile of the ionization rate by comparing the results with those without the mirror force. Simulation results demonstrate that larger kinetic energy lowers the altitude profiles of the collision rate, which is consistent with previous studies. The simulation results also show that the upward motion of electrons bounced back from their mirror points results in the upward broadening of the altitude profile of the collision rate. Electrons with kinetic energies above 100 keV form a secondary peak of the collision rate near the mirror point. The formation of the secondary peak can be explained by the stagnation of electrons around the mirror point because the relatively long duration of staying in neutral gas increases the number of collisions. Simulation results show that under the precipitation of electrons in the kinetic energy range larger than tens of keV with the pitch angle close to the loss cone, the maximum collision rate in the altitude range lower than 100 km becomes one order of the magnitude smaller. The results of the present study suggest the importance of the mirror force for the precise modeling of ionospheric response due to the energetic electron precipitation caused by the pitch angle scattering through wave-particle interactions.

How to cite: Katoh, Y., Rosendahl, P., Ogawa, Y., Hiraki, Y., and Tadokoro, H.: Role of the mirror force on the collision rate due to relativistic electron precipitation, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-7379, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-7379, 2024.

X3.16
|
EGU24-8654
|
ECS
|
Highlight
Antti Salminen, Timo Asikainen, and Kalevi Mursula

Wintertime stratosphere and mesosphere are dominated by the polar vortex, a strong westerly wind system surrounding the pole. Polar vortex is variable and can even temporarily collapse during the winter, especially in the northern hemisphere. Several studies have shown that energetic electron precipitation (EEP) strengthens the northern polar vortex. Precipitating electrons come from the near-Earth space, the magnetosphere, and precipitate to the high-latitude thermosphere and mesosphere. There EEP forms odd nitrogen and hydrogen oxides (NOX and HOX) which destroy ozone and affect the temperature in the middle atmosphere. Most studies of the EEP effect on polar vortex have used reanalysis datasets which are based  on both observations and models. However, most reanalysis datasets are limited to stratospheric heights. We study here the EEP effect on the polar vortex and the modulation of this effect by planetary waves in the stratosphere and mesosphere with satellite measurements of EEP (POES/MEPED) and atmospheric properties (Aura/MLS). We derive the Eliassen-Palm flux, a measure for planetary wave activity, and the zonal wind from geopotential height observations. We show that EEP strengthens the stratospheric polar vortex, as found in earlier studies based on reanalysis data, but weakens the mesospheric polar vortex in the northern hemisphere. We also show that the EEP effect on polar vortex depends on the latitudinal distribution of planetary waves in the stratosphere and mesosphere.

How to cite: Salminen, A., Asikainen, T., and Mursula, K.: Satellite observations of energetic electron precipitation effect on the polar vortex, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-8654, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-8654, 2024.

X3.17
|
EGU24-9212
|
ECS
|
Václav Linzmayer, František Němec, Ondřej Santolík, and Ivana Kolmašová

We experimentally analyze the importance of lightning-generated whistlers for electron precipitation from the Van Allen radiation belts. For this purpose, we use the wave and energetic particle data measured by the low-altitude DEMETER spacecraft between 2006 and 2010, complemented by the lightning locations and times obtained by the World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN). We focus on the region above the United States (L-shells between 2 and 3, geomagnetic longitudes between 300 and 360 degrees). This region exhibits a significant difference in the number of lightning between the local summer and winter, allowing us to contrast the two seasons. Additionally, it is located westward of the South Atlantic Anomaly, i.e., the drift loss cone has not yet been emptied, and there are many particles with pitch angles not too far from the bounce loss cone. We show that during the northern summer, when the number of lightning in the region increases tremendously, there is a considerable increase in both the VLF wave intensity and the precipitating energetic electron flux. We perform a correlation analysis to determine the most affected energy range. It also reveals that the effect is more pronounced during the night than during the day, in agreement with the lower wave attenuation in the ionosphere, and it is more pronounced during periods of low geomagnetic activity compared to those of high geomagnetic activity.

How to cite: Linzmayer, V., Němec, F., Santolík, O., and Kolmašová, I.: Lightning-induced electron precipitation: Statistical analysis of DEMETER satellite data and WWLLN lightning locations, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-9212, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9212, 2024.

X3.18
|
EGU24-11743
Timo Asikainen and Henna-Riikka Putaala

Reconstructions of energetic electron precipitation (EEP) and the atmospheric ionization it produces are important for state-of-the-art chemistry-climate models, which aim to model the climate impacts of EEP. The current version of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project, CMIP6, includes a reconstruction of EEP-induced ionization based on a parameterization dependent on geomagnetic Ap index. This reconstruction has been used in several climate studies over the past years. However, recent investigations have shown that the CMIP6 reconstruction underestimates the level of precipitation. Therefore, the atmospheric/climate impacts of EEP might be underestimated as well.

To address this issue we introduce here a new reconstruction of EEP and the ionization it produces. This reconstruction is based on a new composite of energetic electron measurements from POES satellites which have been corrected for various instrumental and sampling effects. A theoretically motivated form of a pitch angle distribution consistent with pitch angle diffusion is fitted to these data to obtain a more realistic estimate of electron precipitation into the atmosphere.

For the reconstruction we developed a deep learning network, which ingests geomagnetic aa and Dxt indices, sunspot number as well as seasonal variations and solar cycle phase. The network gives as output the daily latitude distributions of precipitating electron fluxes in three energy channels, which is then used to calculate the precipitating electron energy spectrum and associated atmospheric ionization from year 1844 to present.

Here we present the main aspects of this new reconstruction and also compare it with the earlier CMIP6 reconstruction.

How to cite: Asikainen, T. and Putaala, H.-R.: New reconstruction of energetic electron precipitation and atmospheric ionization for 1844-2023 using deep learning networks, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-11743, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-11743, 2024.

X3.19
|
EGU24-11783
|
ECS
Vivian Cribb, Tuija Pulkkinen, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, Larry Kepko, Mackenzie Ratzlaff, and Eric Donovan

Omega bands are mesoscale auroral structures that emerge as eastward moving sinusoidal undulations of the poleward boundary of the equatorward oval in the post-midnight sector. They have been observed during the recovery phase of substorms and storms, and during periods of steady magnetospheric convection, but to date the statistical occurrence characteristics are unknown.

While omega bands can be seen during stormtime events, their drivers and the magnetospheric conditions in which they appear are not well understood. Gaining insight into the geomagnetic conditions and solar wind drivers that give rise to omega bands could greatly benefit theoretical and simulation studies, ultimately enhancing our understanding of global magnetospheric dynamics.  In this work, we perform a superposed epoch analysis of geomagnetic and solar wind parameters for omega band events identified using THEMIS ASI from 2006 to 2013. We use data from OMNI and SuperMAG to quantify the solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere system during these intervals. Since omega bands are known to have a near-Earth source, we hope to use this analysis to better understand their associated current systems and coupling mechanisms between the inner magnetosphere and ionosphere.

How to cite: Cribb, V., Pulkkinen, T., Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Kepko, L., Ratzlaff, M., and Donovan, E.: Exploring solar wind drivers of omega bands, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-11783, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-11783, 2024.

X3.20
|
EGU24-12099
Aaron Breneman, Alexa Halford, Kyle Murphy, Hilde Nesse, Brett Carter, Lauren Blum, Adam Kellerman, Sadie Elliott, and Sam Walton

Energetic particle precipitation (EPP) is one of the fundamental drivers of space weather in the coupled atmosphere-ionosphere-magnetosphere (AIM) system. These electrons and ions from the sun or the terrestrial magnetosphere, ranging in energy from hundreds of eV to GeV, precipitate into the atmosphere in response to enhanced topside (solar and magnetosphere) driving. They deposit their energy at a wide range of altitudes, enhancing ionization, and changing neutral temperature, density, and winds. During times of prolonged driving the resulting changes can adversely affect anthropogenic systems including disruption of communication and power systems, and increased satellite drag leading to orbital decay. In addition to its effects on space weather, EPP has been recognized as an important component of climate via its ability to indirectly destroy ozone, modifying local radiative balance in the middle and upper atmosphere. Despite the recognized importance of EPP to the AIM system, the way in which these two-way coupled systems interact is highly complex and remains poorly understood and constrained. Measurements from our current observational fleet are not able to fully capture EPP-driven AIM dynamics. As a result, we lack a fundamental understanding of many aspects of this coupled system, and models cannot be validated and are inhibited in their ability to forecast space weather. To compound this situation, different aspects of the AIM system are studied by the different communities with insufficient cross-community cooperation. Properly studying AIM dynamics, a societal level priority, requires a global systems science (holistic) approach to data collection, analysis, and modeling. This Chapman conference will bring together participants from the AIM communities to focus efforts on identifying and communicating outstanding issues, how models can bridge knowledge gaps, promising techniques for enhanced analysis, and required new types of observations.

How to cite: Breneman, A., Halford, A., Murphy, K., Nesse, H., Carter, B., Blum, L., Kellerman, A., Elliott, S., and Walton, S.: Chapman conference: Particle Precipitation: Drivers, Properties, and Impacts on Atmosphere, Ionosphere, Magnetosphere (AIM) Coupling – Feb 2025 at RMIT in Melbourne, AU, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-12099, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-12099, 2024.

X3.21
|
EGU24-14915
|
ECS
Josephine Salice, Hilde Nesse, Noora Partamies, Emilia Kilpua, Andrew Kavanagh, Margot Decotte, Eldho Babu, and Christine Smith-Johnsen

Compositional NOx changes caused by energetic electron precipitation (EEP) at a specific altitude and those co-dependent on vertical transport are referred to as the EEP direct and indirect effect, respectively. The direct effect of EEP at lower mesospheric and upper stratospheric altitudes is linked to the high-energy tail of EEP (>300 keV). The relative importance of the two effects on NOx and their subsequent impact on ozone and dynamical changes at these altitudes remains unresolved due to inadequate particle measurements and scarcity of polar mesospheric NOx observations. An accurate parameterization of the high-energy tail of EEP is, therefore, crucial. This study utilizes EEP flux data from MEPED aboard the POES/Metop satellites from 2004 - 2014 to distinguish >30 keV events from >300 keV events. Data from the Northern and Southern Hemispheres (55-70oN/S) are combined in daily flux estimates. Flux peaks above the 90th percentile of the >30 kev flux are identified. The 33% highest and lowest associated responses in the >300 keV fluxes are labeled "E3 events" and "E1 events", respectively, resulting in 55 events of each type. A sub-selection of "overlapping events" is created based on similar >30 keV fluxes responses. Superposed epoch analysis of mesospheric NO density from SOFIE confirms an observable direct impact on lower mesospheric chemistry associated with E3 events. Elevated solar wind speeds persisting in the recovery phase of a deep Dst trough are characteristic of E3 events. A probability assessment identifies specific thresholds in the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling function (epsilon) and the geomagnetic indices Kp*10 and Dst, crucial for determining the occurrence or exclusion of E1 and E3 events. This study provides insight into which parameters are important for accurately modeling the high-energy tail of EEP.

How to cite: Salice, J., Nesse, H., Partamies, N., Kilpua, E., Kavanagh, A., Decotte, M., Babu, E., and Smith-Johnsen, C.: The High-Energy Tail of Energetic Electron Precipitation: Solar Wind Drivers and Geomagnetic Responses, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-14915, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-14915, 2024.

X3.22
|
EGU24-15417
Hilde Nesse and Josephine Salice

Precipitating auroral, ring current, and radiation belt electrons will affect the ionization level and composition of the neutral atmosphere. Knowledge gaps remain regarding the frequency, intensity, and the energy spectrum of the Medium Energy Electron (MEE) precipitation (>30 keV). In particular, the understanding and predictive capabilities of the high-energy tail (>300 keV) are in general poor. This study estimates the loss cone electron fluxes from MEPED observations on board the POES/Metop satellites over a full solar cycle 2004-2014 to distinguish >30 keV events from >300 keV events. Data from the Northern and Southern Hemispheres (55-70oN/S) are combined in daily flux estimates. Flux peaks above the 90th percentile of the >30 kev flux are identified. The 33% highest and lowest associated responses in the >300 keV fluxes are labeled "E3 events" and "E1 events", respectively, resulting in 55 events of each type. Based on superposed epoch analysis, it is evident that high geomagnetic activity increases the probability of E3 events. More specifically, elevated solar wind speeds persisting in the recovery phase of a deep Dst trough appear characteristic of E3 events. Here, we test this assessment by examining solar wind parameters and geomagnetic indices for a selection of single events:

  • E1 and E3 events with similar >30 keV flux strengths
  • The E1 event with highest >30 keV flux strength
  • The E3 event with the weakest >30 keV flux strength
  • The E1 event with the strongest Dst deflection
  • The E3 event with the weakest Dst deflection

How to cite: Nesse, H. and Salice, J.: The High-Energy Tail of Energetic Electron Precipitation: Case studies, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-15417, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15417, 2024.