EGU25-12285, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12285
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Challenges and opportunities in building a global model of plant hydraulics
Manon Sabot1,2, Martin De Kauwe3, Andy Pitman2, Rachael Gallagher4, Anne Verhoef5, Nicolas Martin-StPaul6, Hervé Cochard7, Miquel de Cáceres8, Víctor Flo9, Pin-Hsin Hu1, Belinda Medlyn4, Phillip Papastefanou1, Anna Ukkola2, Sönke Zaehle1, and Yijian Zeng10
Manon Sabot et al.
  • 1Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany (m.e.b.sabot@gmail.com)
  • 2Climate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • 3School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • 4Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
  • 5Department of Geography and Environmental Science, The University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
  • 6INRAE, URFM, Avignon, France
  • 7Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, PIAF, Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • 8CREAF, Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain
  • 9Univ Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
  • 10Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands

Observations of drought-driven damage to vegetation are widespread but, until recently, large-scale terrestrial models used to study climate-vegetation interactions did not capture the contrasting sensitivities of plants to drought. This is changing with the advent of a generation of models that consider plant hydraulics. Plant hydraulics link plant water status to pedoclimatic conditions; as such, explicit consideration of plant hydraulics should make models more mechanistic and predictive. Models, however, diverge in how they represent the plant water transport pathway and relate it to other plant functions (e.g., photosynthesis), so they further diverge in their parameterisation approach for hydraulic processes. Only at the most basic level do plant hydraulic implementations converge on a common set of measurable traits or parameters: two that describe a hydraulic vulnerability curve (e.g., P12 and P50, the water potentials at which 12% and 50% of a plant’s hydraulic conductivity are lost, respectively), and one that quantifies the efficiency of water movement within the plant (e.g., maximum hydraulic conductance). Regrettably, we do not yet know how to obtain regional- or global-scale hydraulic parameters from local-scale measurements, nor how to connect them to other plant traits. In this study, we propose strategies to leverage cross-species hydraulic diversity when scaling traits from the species level into model parameters. We also emphasise the importance of accounting for (i) within-species trait variability across space (e.g., interactions between hydraulic traits and their environment) and (ii) cross-functional trait covariation (i.e., interactions – or lack thereof – among traits that characterise different functional axes). Beyond advancing regional and global plant hydraulic modelling, efforts to address the suggested strategies would ready models for simulations that capture the resilience of vegetation communities worldwide.

How to cite: Sabot, M., De Kauwe, M., Pitman, A., Gallagher, R., Verhoef, A., Martin-StPaul, N., Cochard, H., de Cáceres, M., Flo, V., Hu, P.-H., Medlyn, B., Papastefanou, P., Ukkola, A., Zaehle, S., and Zeng, Y.: Challenges and opportunities in building a global model of plant hydraulics, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-12285, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12285, 2025.