EGU25-12843, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12843
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 01 May, 16:35–16:45 (CEST)
 
Room N1
Revisiting the primary production control on wetland methane emission
Avni Malhotra1,2, Patrick Megonigal3, Inke Forbrich4, Tiia Määttä2, Kendalynn Morris1, Roberta Bittencourt Peixoto4, Stephanie Wilson3, Jianqiu Zheng1, and Vanessa Bailey1
Avni Malhotra et al.
  • 1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, United States of America (avni.malhotra@pnnl.gov)
  • 2Geography Department, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA
  • 4University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA

The relationship between plant primary production and wetland methane (CH4) emission is well established. This relationship is expected because plant production fuels methanogenesis and plants act as conduits for gas exchange between the soil and the atmosphere. Recent global increases in bottom-up measurements of wetland CH4 provide a new opportunity to revisit the hypothesis that plant production and CH4 flux have a positive linear relationship in wetlands. 

Using paired CH4 and gross primary productivity (GPP) measurements from 56 wetland sites, we found that CH4 and GPP are weakly related, with the maximum R2 from linear regressions being 0.14 (p= 0.0081). Instead, we found some support for a unimodal relationship (R2= 0.24, p= 0.0016) between GPP and CH4 flux. While flooded sites exhibited strong GPP-CH4 relationships, sites where the mean annual water table depth was below the soil surface showed weak or no GPP-CH4 relationship. This suggests that variable degrees of CH4 oxidation, among other factors, could be weakening the apparent relationship between GPP and CH4

In this presentation, we will discuss processes that could disrupt the expected positive linear relationship between plant production and CH4 using multi-scale examples from syntheses, lab and field experiments. We will also explore why the GPP-CH4 relationship may not scale across space and time and how this affects the utility of GPP as a CH4 predictor. 

How to cite: Malhotra, A., Megonigal, P., Forbrich, I., Määttä, T., Morris, K., Bittencourt Peixoto, R., Wilson, S., Zheng, J., and Bailey, V.: Revisiting the primary production control on wetland methane emission, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-12843, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12843, 2025.