- University of Calgary, Schulich School of Engineering, Calgary, Canada (diana.spieler@ucalgary.ca)
When starting a new modelling task, one of the very first decisions the modeller has to make is the choice of which model(s) to use. That this selection can have a significant impact on our model results has been shown through numerous studies (e.g. Melsen et al. [2018], Mendoza et al. [2015]). That it is often based on legacy (habit, practicality, convenience) rather than adequacy (fitness for purpose) has also been recognized (Addor&Melsen [2019]). We present the results of a literature review on previous model selection practices to better understand what modellers have considered important when choosing a model for a particular purpose.
We analyze more than 250 studies discussing model selection, model intercomparison or multi-model studies with a focus on conceptual hydrologic models. We identify the criteria used to determine which models were considered “fit for purpose” and why. The analyzed studies compare between two and 7488 model structures in two to 1013 basins. We aggregate information on the evaluation criteria used for different modelling purposes and in different locations and identify common model selection strategies. We monitor the range of model performance in individual comparisons and document both, the progress made and the challenges faced during previous model comparisons.
Our analysis shows a strong dependency on aggregated statistical metrics and a tendency for simplified calibration approaches that were meant to support a broad range of evaluation practices. This often led to a lack of clear answers on which models to prefer. The reasons that were given for (not) selecting a specific model structure seem to indicate a mismatch between the perceptions of when model adequacy is reached. We therefore conclude with a critical discussion of previous model selection strategies and call for a more nuanced approach to model evaluation as well as standards for reporting modelling practices and results.
How to cite: Spieler, D. and Stadnyk, T.: Fantastic Models and How to Find Them: A Literature Review on Model Selection Practices, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-13119, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13119, 2025.