EGU25-13337, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13337
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 29 Apr, 14:55–15:05 (CEST)
 
Room D3
Basin modelling of the complex multi-rift system on Southern Vøring Margin : mechanisms and implications
Mansour M. Abdelmalak1, Jan Inge Faleide1, Ivar Midtkandal1, Anca Druga2, Mauro Aldinucci2, Dmitry Zastrozhnov1, Filippos Tsikalas1,2, and Sébastien Gac3
Mansour M. Abdelmalak et al.
  • 1University of Oslo, Department of Geosciences, Oslo, Norway (m.m.abdelmalak@geo.uio.no)
  • 2Vår Energi ASA, Stavanger, Norway
  • 3OptoScale, Trondheim, Norway

Passive continental margins and sedimentary basins are key domains for understanding long-term geological processes driven by complex Earth dynamics, such as continental rifting, magmatism, and sub-lithospheric interactions. These processes shape regions and leave distinct, spatially variable imprints in the sedimentary record. Deciphering these records helps us understand the dynamic relationships between geological processes on passive margins and quantify the interplay among tectonic, magmatic, and sedimentary forces that influence basin architecture.

In this study, we model the thermal-kinematic history of the southern Vøring Basin, offshoreMid-Norway, along a regional 2-D transect, integrating basin- and lithosphere-scale processes through time-forward basin modeling and an automated inverse basin reconstruction approach. The results indicate that the evolution of the inner Vøring Margin can be explained by standard lithosphere extension models. However, these models fail to account for key observations at the outer volcanic province, such as regional uplift at breakup, excess magmatism, and higher geothermal gradients. These discrepancies suggest additional processes are involved. Excess magmatism and uplift may be linked to sub-lithospheric mantle processes, such as the arrival of the Icelandic mantle plume or small-scale convection. Melt retention in the asthenosphere, along with mantle phase transitions during extension, could enhance uplift.

The best-fit model must explain the following key observations at both the inner and outer margins: (1) observed stratigraphy and subsidence, (2) beta factors along the transect, (3) vitrinite reflectance, particularly the high %Ro values at the outer margin, (4) base Eocene paleobathymetry, with an emergent outer margin and structural highs, and (5) the interpreted magmatic underplate beneath the outer margin.

We test various tectono-thermal models that include or exclude these processes. Models incorporating a plume emplaced at Eocene time, accounting for magmatic processes like melt retention and underplating, successfully reproduce the observations at the outer volcanic margin. This supports the contribution of the hot Icelandic plume to the Vøring Margin's evolution.

How to cite: Abdelmalak, M. M., Faleide, J. I., Midtkandal, I., Druga, A., Aldinucci, M., Zastrozhnov, D., Tsikalas, F., and Gac, S.: Basin modelling of the complex multi-rift system on Southern Vøring Margin : mechanisms and implications, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-13337, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13337, 2025.