- 1School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
- 2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
- 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States of America
- 4Langley Research Center, NASA, Hampton, VA, United States of America
- 5Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America
Hydrogen fuel can help decarbonize the economy, but hydrogen leakage has indirect climate consequences. Atmospheric oxidation of hydrogen by hydroxyl radicals (OH) increases methane, ozone, and stratospheric water vapor concentrations. Current global 3-D atmospheric chemistry models estimate a global warming potential for hydrogen of 12 ± 3 over a 100-year horizon (GWP-100), but the models overestimate global OH concentrations and underestimate OH reactivity (OHR). These OH biases cause overestimates of the responses of methane and ozone to hydrogen. Here, we compare the hydrogen GWP-100 calculated from the standard GEOS-Chem model and a modified GEOS-Chem model where OH and OHR biases are corrected with missing organic emissions and a terminal OH sink over continents. The hydrogen GWP-100 from the standard GEOS-Chem model agrees with previous studies, but the modified GEOS-Chem model is 20% lower. Better understanding of the factors controlling global OH concentrations and OHR is needed for hydrogen GWP estimates.
How to cite: Yang, L., Jacob, D., Lin, H., Dang, R., Bates, K., East, J., Travis, K., Pendergrass, D., and Murray, L.: Assessment of Hydrogen’s Climate Impact Is Affected by Model OH Biases, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-1429, 2025.
