EGU25-14338, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14338
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Estimating the Tipping Point between N2O Emissions and C Sequestration in Soil using the DNDC v. CAN Model
Meng Kong1, Huan Liu1, Diego Abalos1, Brian B. Grant2, Ward N. Smith2, Azhar Zhartybayeva1, Johannes L. Jensen1, Jørgen Eriksen1, and Christian Dold1
Meng Kong et al.
  • 1Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele
  • 2Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada

Increasing the grassland proportion in the crop rotation has been considered as an effective approach to sequester carbon (C) in the soil. However, its climate mitigation benefits may be overestimated because the associated impact of long-term C sequestration on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions remains uncertain. Mechanistic models, such as the DeNitrification and DeComposition model (DNDC v. CAN 9.5.0), are used to simulate changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) and N2O emissions. This provides the opportunity to estimate future emission trends and to enhance our understanding of the interactions between SOC and N2O emissions under different levels of grass/clover proportion in arable crop rotations. We hypothesize that increases in N2O emissions will offset the benefits from the increased SOC over time. The objectives of this study are to (1) calibrate and validate the DNDC model, and (2) estimate and predict the potential tipping point at which the negative climate forcing of N2O emissions offsets the benefits of C sequestration over long-term timescales. For this, we used long-term measurements of biomass, SOC, and N2O emissions from two crop rotations with either two or four years of grass-clover in a six-year rotation in Denmark. Preliminary results showed that the DNDC model simulated crop biomass production with fair to high accuracy as indicated by an index of agreement (d) of 0.98, a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 1, and a normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) of less than 30%. The simulated biomass was slightly underestimated as shown by a negative mean bias error (MBE). Conversely, the simulations for N2O fluxes and SOC exhibited poorer agreement, with d-values below 0.7 and nRMSE exceeding 30%. These findings suggest that while the DNDC model effectively predicts crop growth, including annual crops and grass/clover ley, its ability to simulate SOC and N2O fluxes requires substantial improvement. Our future efforts will focus on refining and optimizing model parameters for SOC and N2O, with an emphasis on calibration to enhance the model performance and the capacity to predict management-induced long-term dynamics under future climate scenarios. Results of these updated model simulations will be shown at the conference.

How to cite: Kong, M., Liu, H., Abalos, D., Grant, B. B., Smith, W. N., Zhartybayeva, A., Jensen, J. L., Eriksen, J., and Dold, C.: Estimating the Tipping Point between N2O Emissions and C Sequestration in Soil using the DNDC v. CAN Model, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-14338, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14338, 2025.