EGU25-14345, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14345
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 01 May, 09:40–09:50 (CEST)
 
Room 0.11/12
Benefits of online bias-correction versus postproessing methods
Judith Berner, Abby Jaye, and William E. Chapman
Judith Berner et al.
  • United States of America (berner@ucar.edu)

Recently, there has been pronoued interest in predictability on the

subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescale. Skill at this forecast range is

only positive, if the lead-time dependent forecast bias is removed.

Recently, Chapman and Berner, 2024, developed an online bias-correction

from nudging tendencies and saw a bias reduction for surface and

free-atmosphere variables of up to 60% in climate simulations. Here, we

quantify the performance of this model-error scheme against

post-processing in S2S-forecasts. We find that the online bias-correction

reduces the bias, but less so than removing the lead-time dependent bias.

Together, they perform better than reducing the lead-time dependent bias

alone.

How to cite: Berner, J., Jaye, A., and Chapman, W. E.: Benefits of online bias-correction versus postproessing methods, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-14345, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14345, 2025.