EGU25-14346, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14346
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Monday, 28 Apr, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Monday, 28 Apr, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X1, X1.15
Amazon upland forest CH4 fluxes: A small sink or a small source? A case study
Lívia Rosalem1, Hella van Asperen2, Shujiro Komiya2, Sam P. Jones2, Santiago Botía3, Fernanda Cunha1, Susan Trumbore2, and Cléo Quaresma Dias Júnior4
Lívia Rosalem et al.
  • 1Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil (liviarosalem@gmail.com)
  • 2Departament for Biogeochemical Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry – Jena, Germany
  • 3Departament for Biogeochemical Signals, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry – Jena, Germany
  • 4Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology (IFPA)

Methane (CH4) is an important greenhouse gas whose natural sources are still poorly understood, and significant uncertainties in their quantification remain. Tropical upland forests generally present a small CH4 sink with occasional local emission hotspots, making it challenging to determine the net ecosystem flux. This study employs two complementary micro-meteorological methods to estimate methane (CH4) fluxes from a Terra Firme (upland forest) ecosystem in the central Amazon. At the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) field site, CH4 and CO2 concentrations are continuously monitored at five different heights above and below the canopy (79, 53, 38, 24, 4 meters). Additionally, Eddy Covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes, along with micro-meteorological observations, are conducted at various heights. To estimate ecosystem CH4 fluxes, the Modified Bowen Ratio (MBR) technique was applied. This method uses the concentration gradient and the flux of a trace gas (in this study CO2 and H2O), to calculate the eddy diffusivity (k), which is then used to estimate the flux of another trace gas (in this study CH4). MBR CH4 fluxes were estimated for the period 2014-2021. Additionally, vertical concentration profiles were analyzed to gain further insights into the temporal patterns of CH4 fluxes. The MBR flux estimates and vertical profile analyses revealed clear seasonal patterns. During the wet season, positive concentration gradients indicated net CH4 emissions from the forest, while in the dry season, negative gradients suggested net CH4 uptake. Ecosystem median CH4 fluxes, estimated with the MBR technique, dominantly showed CH4 uptake and ranged between -2 and 2 nmol m-2 s-1. With these results, we aim to highlight the seasonal and interannual patterns of upland forest CH4 fluxes, which are essential for understanding the contribution of tropical upland forests to the Amazon's CH4 budget.

How to cite: Rosalem, L., van Asperen, H., Komiya, S., P. Jones, S., Botía, S., Cunha, F., Trumbore, S., and Quaresma Dias Júnior, C.: Amazon upland forest CH4 fluxes: A small sink or a small source? A case study, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-14346, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14346, 2025.