EGU25-1442, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-1442
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 30 Apr, 08:30–18:00
 
vPoster spot A, vPA.2
A conceptual model explaining spatial variation in soil nitrous oxide emissions inagricultural fields 
Ziliang Zhang1,2, William C. Eddy2, Emily R. Stuchiner2, Evan H. DeLucia2, and Wendy H. Yang2
Ziliang Zhang et al.
  • 1Northwestern Polytechnical University, School of Ecology and Environment, Xi'an, China (zhangzl2023@nwpu.edu.cn)
  • 2Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61822, USA

Soil emissions of nitrous oxide contribute substantially to global warming from agriculture. Our understanding of soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and its controlling factors in the environment is challenged by high temporal and spatial heterogeneity in emissions, which leads to uncertainty in the benefits of climate-smart agricultural practices. Here, we present a conceptual model explaining spatial variation in temporal patterns of soil nitrous oxide emissions developed from high spatial resolution measurements of soil nitrous oxide emissions, gross nitrous oxide fluxes, and soil physicochemical properties in two maize fields in Illinois, USA. In sub-field locations with consistently low nitrous oxide emissions, soil nitrate and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) constrained nitrous oxide production irrespective of changes in soil moisture. In sub-field locations where high emissions occurred episodically, soil nitrate and dissolved organic carbon availability were higher, and increases in soil moisture stimulated nitrous oxide production. These findings form the ‘cannon model’ which conceptualizes how sub-field scale variation in soil nitrate and DOC determines where increases in soil moisture can trigger high soil nitrous oxide emissions within agricultural fields. Understanding the drivers of spatial variation in soil nitrate and DOC is therefore the key to developing precision agricultural practices (e.g., variable fertilizer application rates within fields) that target reductions in N2O emissions from hot spots that disproportionately contribute to field-scale N2O budgets. This also suggests another way in which climate-smart agricultural practices aimed at increasing soil organic carbon may inadvertently increase soil N2O emissions, by increasing DOC and soil nitrate derived from soil organic matter to turn cold spots into hot spots. Overall, this conceptual breakthrough in understanding controls on spatial variation in soil N2O emissions holds promise for guiding future efforts to reduce uncertainty in and effectively mitigate agricultural soil N2O emissions.

How to cite: Zhang, Z., Eddy, W. C., Stuchiner, E. R., DeLucia, E. H., and Yang, W. H.: A conceptual model explaining spatial variation in soil nitrous oxide emissions inagricultural fields , EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-1442, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-1442, 2025.