EGU25-15116, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15116
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Thursday, 01 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Thursday, 01 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X2, X2.14
Assessing the vertical localization of seismic variations retrieved by passive surface wave interferometry
Antoine Guillemot1, Eric Larose2, and Laurent Baillet2
Antoine Guillemot et al.
  • 1Géolithe, Crolles, France (antoine.guillemot@geolithe.com)
  • 2Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont-Blanc, CNRS, IRD, IFSTTAR, ISTerre, Grenoble, France

Passive seismic interferometry based on noise correlations has become an efficient way to detect tiny temporal changes of properties of Earth’s subsurface and crust. In particular, this method has successfully been used for environmental seismology issues, in a view of investigating the response of shallow subsurface to environmental changes, in particular thermal and hydrogeological forcings (1). An accurate spatial localization of elastic variations is thus a key objective to understand the processes involved in the whole volume probed.

Nevertheless, estimating the spatial distribution of these changes using coda waves is not a straightforward problem, regarding the complexity of scattered waves. Several assumptions are often used to simplify the coda waves and to estimate their sensitivity kernels to elastic changes (2). Here, our work focuses on the vertical localization of seismic variations observed by coda wave interferometry, reducing the problem to an estimation of the depth of shear stiffness variations over time in a 1D layered medium.

A time-lapse coda wave inversion scheme is commonly used, solving a linear least-square inverse problem (3) (4). Several other methods can also be tested, from Marko Chain Monte-Carlo Bayesian inversion to gradient descent algorithms. The choice of regularization parameters and checkerboard tests are discussed here, and help to discriminate the relevant method regarding the accuracy of the results and the vertical resolution obtained. Additionally, we applied these time-lapse inversion procedures to real seismic noise datasets recorded on slope instabilities such as rock glaciers and landslides.

This work illustrates how estimating the depth of seismic velocity changes contributes to characterizing the shallow subsurface and monitoring its sensitivity to various forcings.

 

 References

  • Richter, T., Sens‐Schönfelder, C., Kind, R., & Asch, G. (2014). Comprehensive observation and modeling of earthquake and temperature‐related seismic velocity changes in northern Chile with passive image interferometry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(6), 4747-4765
  • Obermann, A., & Hillers, G. (2019). Seismic time-lapse interferometry across scales. In Advances in geophysics(Vol. 60, pp. 65-143). Elsevier.
  • Mordret, A., Courbis, R., Brenguier, F., Chmiel, M., Garambois, S., Mao, S., ... & Hollis, D. (2020). Noise-based ballistic wave passive seismic monitoring–Part 2: surface waves. Geophysical Journal International221(1), 692-705.
  • Fokker, E., Ruigrok, E., Hawkins, R., & Trampert, J. (2023). 4D physics‐based pore pressure monitoring using passive image interferometry. Geophysical Research Letters50(5), e2022GL101254.

How to cite: Guillemot, A., Larose, E., and Baillet, L.: Assessing the vertical localization of seismic variations retrieved by passive surface wave interferometry, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-15116, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15116, 2025.