EGU25-15370, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15370
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 28 Apr, 11:55–12:05 (CEST)
 
Room C
SOCOMv2: On the strengths and limits of pCO2 interpolations products to estimate the ocean carbon sink
Alizée Roobaert1, Daniel J. Ford2, Christian Rödenbeck3, Nicolas Gruber4, Judith Hauck5, Amanda R. Fay6, Thea Hatlen Heimdal6, Jacqueline Behncke7, Abby Shaum6, Gregor Luke4, Andrew Watson2, Laique M. Djeutchouang8, Sreeush Mohanan5, Marion Gehlen9, Annika Jersild10, Jiye Zeng11, Yosuke Iida12, Frederic Chevallier9, Galen A. McKinley6, Jamie D. Shutler2, and the SOCOMv2 team*
Alizée Roobaert et al.
  • 1Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), Ostend, Belgium (alizee.roobaert@vliz.be)
  • 2University of Exeter, UK
  • 3Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Germany
  • 4Environmental Physics, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 5Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
  • 6Columbia University and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York, 10964 USA
  • 7Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Germany
  • 8Stellenbosch University and Southern Ocean Carbon – Climate Observatory, CSIR, South Africa
  • 9LSCE/IPSL, France
  • 10NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA
  • 11National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
  • 12Atmosphere and Ocean Department, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan
  • *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract

The ocean is an important sink for anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2), but recent data from the Global Carbon Budget (GCB) highlight discrepancies in ocean carbon uptake estimates. Since the early 2000s, reconstructions of in-water CO2 fugacity (fCO2) using advanced interpolation techniques (data-products) have shown a growing divergence from estimates derived from global hindcast model simulations. This offsets in the mean flux amounts to approximately 0.49 GtC per year in the decade 2014-2023. The reasons for this discrepancy are not fully understood but may stem from a combination of factors including insufficient data coverage, uncertainties in scaling measurement-based estimates, and errors in model simulations. Previous studies suggests that biases in the fCO2 data-products from the under-sampled Southern Hemisphere, may contribute significantly to this gap.

To address these concerns, the Surface Ocean CO2 Mapping project has launched its second phase (SOCOMv2). This initiative aims to identify and quantify the accuracy and uncertainties related to data availability, changing observational networks, and input data. SOCOMv2 includes four key experiments: 1) a comprehensive geospatial uncertainty analysis, and three subsampling studies employing: 2) GCB hindcast simulations to capture true climate variability, 3) large ensemble simulations representing multiple climate states, and 4) idealized carbon uptake scenarios without climate variation. These efforts aim to provide a clearer understanding of the underlying factors contributing to the observed discrepancies in ocean carbon uptake estimates.

Results from the GCB subsampling hindcast simulation experiments reveal that individual fCO2 data-product reconstructions can significantly overestimate or underestimate both the annual mean and the trend of the ocean carbon sink relative to the models ‘truth’. Nonetheless, the ensemble mean of the fCO2 data-products tends to exhibit only a small overestimation of the model ‘truth’ ocean carbon sink. These discrepancies highlight the impact of limited data coverage and the inherent challenges of extrapolating from sparse measurements but cannot fully explain the observed divergence between models and fCO2 reconstructions in the GCB.

SOCOMv2 aims to improve the accuracy and precision of ocean carbon flux estimates, contributing to improved observational approaches and guiding policy development for climate mitigation. SOCOMv2 efforts have been driven by the community, with supporting funding within a larger European Space Agency ocean carbon study (Ocean Carbon for Climate).

SOCOMv2 team:

Roobaert, Alizée¹, Ford, Daniel J.², Rödenbeck, Christian³, Gruber, Nicolas⁴, Hauck, Judith⁵, Fay, Amanda R.⁶, Heimdal, Thea Hatlen⁶, Behncke, Jacqueline⁷, Shaum, Abby⁶, Gregor, Luke⁴, Watson, Andrew², Djeutchouang, Laique M.⁸, Mohanan, Sreeush⁵, Gehlen, Marion⁹, Jersild, Annika¹⁰, Zeng, Jiye¹¹, Iida, Yosuke¹², Chevallier, Frederic⁹, McKinley, Galen A.⁶, Shutler, Jamie D.², and Landschützer, Peter¹

How to cite: Roobaert, A., Ford, D. J., Rödenbeck, C., Gruber, N., Hauck, J., Fay, A. R., Heimdal, T. H., Behncke, J., Shaum, A., Luke, G., Watson, A., Djeutchouang, L. M., Mohanan, S., Gehlen, M., Jersild, A., Zeng, J., Iida, Y., Chevallier, F., McKinley, G. A., and Shutler, J. D. and the SOCOMv2 team: SOCOMv2: On the strengths and limits of pCO2 interpolations products to estimate the ocean carbon sink, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-15370, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15370, 2025.