Are baseflow separation methods suitable for assessing shallow alluvial aquifers’ contribution to streamflow?

Currently, climate change and increasing water demand pose a growing threat to the future availability of water for human societies and ecosystems that depend on it. At the same time, growing evidence suggests that groundwater is playing an increasingly active role in the global water cycle, particularly in sustaining river flows worldwide (Xie et al., 2024). In this context, quantifying the water exchange between these two components of the hydrological cycle becomes essential for an integrated assessment of water availability. For this purpose, baseflow separation methods are valuable tools, though their limitations remain a subject of debate.

Several authors have suggested that commonly used baseflow separation methods should be applied with caution, since these methods often produce large estimation errors, when they are compared with results obtained using three-dimensional flow numerical models (hereafter referred to as 3D models), thereby limiting their applicability. Nevertheless, these methods remain a widely used alternative due to their lower data and resource requirements compared to 3D models. To address these limitations, we proposed a novel methodology based on baseflow separation methods for analysing the interactions between a shallow alluvial aquifer system and the overlying river network. Subsequently, we tested its performance against a 3D model.

The study area is the alluvial aquifer system located at the confluence of the Tarn, Aveyron and Garonne rivers. A 3D model was developed using the BRGM’s MARTHE software. The study area was divided into sub-zones that meet the same isolation conditions for the river network delimited for the analysis of the results to ensure a more robust validation. Time series of flow and cumulative volume for components of the water balance in the river network, as well as flow at gauging points, were analysed. Additionally, different integration periods (quarterly, half-yearly, annual, and biannual) were examined. Several baseflow separation methods were tested, including both digital filtering and graphical methods.

The results showed that the methods proposed by Chapman (1991) and Chapman and Maxwell (1996) consistently outperformed all others across the entire study area and for all integration periods. R² coefficients of determination greater than 0.8 were obtained in both cases for integration periods exceeding six months. Notably, shorter integration periods better captured the temporal variation of water exchange between the aquifer and the river network. However, longer integration periods produced more accurate overall results, likely because the filters struggled to capture flow reversals between the aquifer and river network during flood events.

 

Acknowledgments: Authors acknowledge the funding provided by project WaMA-WaDiT (PCI2024-153483) funded by MICIU /AEI /10.13039/501100011033/ UE

References

Chapman, T. G. (1991). Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses. Water Resources Research, 27(7), 1783–1784. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR01007

Chapman, T. G., & Maxwell, A. I. (1996). Baseflow separation: Comparison of numerical methods with tracer experiments. Paper presented at the Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium: Water and the Environment, Institution of Engineers, Australia.

Xie, J., Liu, X., Jasechko, S., et al. (2024). Majority of global river flow sustained by groundwater. Nature Geoscience, 17, 770–777. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01483-5