- 1Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (riikkar@bio.ku.dk)
- 2Eau Terre Environnement Research Centre, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Quebec, Canada
- 3Department of Physics, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- 4Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
- 5CARRTEL Laboratory, University Savoie Mont Blanc INRAE, France
- 6School of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Essex, UK
- 7Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
- 8Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland
- 9Department of Geoscience and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 10Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
The chemical diversity of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from terrestrial vegetation is relatively well understood, while research on VOC emissions from freshwater and marine systems has largely focused on dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and isoprene. Through VOC concentration measurements in water samples, and VOC flux measurements using floating chambers and the direct eddy covariance (EC) technique we aim to evaluate aquatic ecosystems as sources of VOCs. Here, we present selected case studies that demonstrate the need to consider other VOCs beyond DMS and isoprene when assessing aquatic sources of atmospheric VOCs.
A survey of depth-specific VOC concentrations in water from four Alpine lakes in France showed that VOC concentrations were highest either at the deep chlorophyll maximum or at the surface. The VOC composition profiles differed between depths and lakes. In another study, we assessed net emissions of VOCs from three ponds in a rewetted peatland forest in Denmark. Again, the three ponds showed differences in the quantity and diversity of their emission profiles. Over 100 chemical species were detected, including acetone, acetaldehyde, isoprene, other terpenoids, and hydrocarbons. The most eutrophic and acidic pond had highest emission rates but lower VOC diversity compared to the alkaline ponds.
The VOC emission rates and compositions also vary over time, depending on the balance between VOC production, consumption, and emission rates, driven by both biotic and abiotic factors. Our EC flux measurements on Utö Island in the Baltic Sea show strong seasonal variation in marine VOC emissions, which can be coupled to the biomass and phenology of the phytoplankton as well as to environmental factors.
We highlight the emerging diversity of VOC emissions from aquatic ecosystems. These emissions need to be better quantified to assess their atmospheric fate and implications.
How to cite: Rinnan, R., Slater, E., Hughes, R., Qin, Y., Foroughan, M., Laurion, I., Chiapusio, G., Steinke, M., Laakso, L., Hellén, H., Kraft, K., Seppälä, J., Roslund, K., Riis Christiansen, J., and Holst, T.: Emerging diversity of volatile organic compounds from freshwater and marine ecosystems, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-15710, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15710, 2025.