EGU25-15722, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15722
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
War-induced obstruction of natural resources restoration: quantitative evidences from the Tigray Region, Ethiopia
Tesfaalem Ghebreyohannes Asfaha1, Jan Nyssen1,2, Sofie Annys2, Hailemariam Meaza Gebregergis1, Zbelo Tesfamariam Welemaram1, Emnet Negash gebremeskel1,2, and Amaury Frankl2
Tesfaalem Ghebreyohannes Asfaha et al.
  • 1Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Mekelle, University, Mekelle, Ethiopia
  • 2Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Wars are usually associated with degradation of natural resources. With the objective of quantifying the effect of the two years’ (2020-2022) Tigray war on degradation of natural resources that have been under restoration, 10 ex-battlefield (ex-BF) and 12 non-battlefield (NBF) sites were selected. The ex-BF sites were further divided into exclosures (n = 5) and farmlands (n = 5), while NBFs were divided into exclosures (n = 6) and farmlands (n = 6). Detail field observations were carried out through transect walks and farmers were interviewed (n=500). To measure the impacts of the war on land degradation, field measurements were conducted on bunds (n = 324), check dams (n = 87), war fortifications (n = 102), tree plots (n = 143), footpaths (n = 17), waterways (n = 44), and gullies (n = 85). These were verified using high resolution Google Earth Imageries as well as  Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data calculated from Sentinel 2 satellite images that were acquired before and after the war and through interviewing farmers (n=500). The findings reveal that the mean proportion of war-induced damaged bunds was 0.246 ± 0.185. A significant difference in bund destruction was observed between BFs and NBFs (p < 0.0001). Combatants used stones from bunds to construct war trenches up to 650 m long. In addition, 52% of the farmers perceived that the war disrupted exclosure management. Plot level analysis also shows that mean proportion of destroyed trees was 0.31 ± 0.15, with greater tree loss in BFs (46% ± 13%) compared to NBFs (19% ± 12%) (p < 0.0001). Besides, 44% of the check dams were damaged across the sites, with 78.3% of check dams in BFs classified as being in poor condition compared to 31.1% in NBFs. Moreover, the average pit volume in BFs and NBFs was 0.503 ± 0.389 m³, with mean sediment displacement in BFs (0.82 ± 0.17 m³) higher than in NBFs (p<0.006). New and reactivated gullies were also found with variable volumes, ranging from 134.3 ± 92.4 m³ in NBFs to 362.7 ± 629.4 m³ in BFs. In conclusion, the war resulted in obstruction of restoration process of the natural resources that have been undergoing in the degraded region over the last three decades. Therefore, integrated post-war rehabilitation strategies are needed to mitigate the environmental problems caused by the war.

How to cite: Asfaha, T. G., Nyssen, J., Annys, S., Gebregergis, H. M., Welemaram, Z. T., gebremeskel, E. N., and Frankl, A.: War-induced obstruction of natural resources restoration: quantitative evidences from the Tigray Region, Ethiopia, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-15722, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15722, 2025.