EGU25-15744, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15744
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Palaeogeography of the Eastern Tauern Window (Eastern Alps, Austria)
Wolfgang Frank1, Bernhard Grasemann1, Thomas Meisel2, Jennifer Spalding3, David Schneider3, Benjamin Huet4, Christoph Iglseder4, and Daniela Gallhofer5
Wolfgang Frank et al.
  • 1University of Vienna, Department for Geology, Vienna, Austria (wolfgang.frank@univie.ac.at)
  • 2Montanuniversität Leoben, Department for Analytical Chemistry, Leoben, Austria
  • 3University of Ottawa, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ottawa Canada
  • 4Geosphere Austria, Vienna, Austria
  • 5University of Graz, Department of Earth Sciences, Graz, Austria

The Tauern Windows in the Eastern Alps is one of the most spectacular tectonic window, which formed after opening and closure of the Alpine Tethys between Europe and the Adriatic micro-continent. The herein described paleogeographical model is based on a new lithostratigraphic unit, the Wörth Formation, which formed as a local Jurassic black shale deepwater trough below the CCD on a strongly attenuated crustal basement. It developed as an oblique depression between the European continent and the Permian-Jurassic metasediments of the Seidlwinkl Nappe, which became an isolated element during opening of the Alpine Tethys. The Wörth Formation trough terminated to the NW within the European continent but maintained an open connection to the main Alpine Tethys towards SE. Different clastic sediments were derived from both sides of the trough: detrital mica-rich sandstones intruded by gabbroic laccoliths (167 Ma), olistoliths and re-sedimentation of Keuper beds, yet no indication of Triassic carbonates were derived from the northern side. In contrast, the deposits on the southern side are characterized by carbonate-bearing quartz-schists, breccias of Triassic carbonates, arkoses and tectonic slivers from the basement (Modereck crystalline).

Radiolarites and “Aptychen” limestones are useful marker lithologies for better lithostratigraphic interpretations. Until now Aptychen limestones got little attention, but could be recognized in all environment and most tectonic units from the Matrei Zone to the Klammkalk Zone. Rare locations have been detected, where at the base of the Glockner nappe a primary sedimentary succession of siliciclastic Jurassic into the typical marly “Kalkglimmerschiefer” lithology has been preserved. The Sandstone-Breccia unit is now understood as a continuously pro-grading accretionary wedge, containing considerable portion of clastics, derived from the southern border of Alpine Tethys and emplaced during post-Albian times on the northern parts of the Wörth Formation. White mica Ar ages, clustering regionally at 30 my and only little younger restricted apatite FT ages (see Spalding et al. Poster Session GD9.1) indicate early cooling due to a detachment process (see Brunner et al. Poster Session GD9.1) at the frontal part of the accretionary wedge.

The complex paleogeography has also important consequences for the tectonic evolution history:  It caused the contrasting structural architecture of the Glockner nappe W and E of the Rauris valley and the restriction of the HP-rocks (lawsonite pseudomorphs, eclogites) to the western side of Glockner nappe. The basement units of the eastern Tauern window should not interpreted as the direct continuation of the western basement. Earlier interpretations for different rifting ages in this part of Alpine Tethys, Jurassic in the S and Cretaceous in the N, lost their validity.

How to cite: Frank, W., Grasemann, B., Meisel, T., Spalding, J., Schneider, D., Huet, B., Iglseder, C., and Gallhofer, D.: Palaeogeography of the Eastern Tauern Window (Eastern Alps, Austria), EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-15744, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15744, 2025.