EGU25-15841, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15841
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 28 Apr, 11:05–11:15 (CEST)
 
Room E2
Modeling peat burned area and understanding its drivers with machine learning
Jonas Mortelmans1, Gabrielle De Lannoy1, Devon Dunmire1, Sander Veraverbeke2,3, James Waddington4, Rebecca Scholten5, and Michel Bechtold1
Jonas Mortelmans et al.
  • 1KU Leuven, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Leuven, Belgium (jonas.mortelmans@kuleuven.be)
  • 2Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Earth Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 3School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, UK
  • 4School of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • 5University of California, Irvine, Department of Earth System Science, Irvine, CA, USA

Peatland fires pose significant environmental and societal challenges. We recently advanced the Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) system for northern peatlands by integrating peatland-specific hydrological data derived from assimilating Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) L-band brightness temperature observations into the NASA Catchment Land Surface model with its peatland modules, ‘PEATCLSM’. This novel FWIpeat (Mortelmans et al. 2024) was evaluated using satellite-based fire presence data over boreal peatlands from 2010 through 2018, demonstrating improved estimation of peatland fire presence.

Here, we extend the use of this renewed FWIpeat system by integrating it into a machine learning framework to gain deeper insights into when, where, and why peatlands burn. We utilize an XGBoost algorithm trained on peatland burned area data from 2012-2023, incorporating a suite of predictors, including (i) peatland distribution characteristics, (ii) peatland groundwater table, (iii) lightning occurrence, (iv) meteorological data, (v) vegetation properties, and (vi) socio-economic factors. This approach enables proactive fire risk management strategies and contributes to a comprehensive assessment of peatland fire vulnerability and resilience. Preliminary results indicate the importance of peatland groundwater table and lightning occurrence in estimating peat burned area.

Mortelmans, J., Felsberg, A., De Lannoy, G. J. M., Veraverbeke, S., Field, R. D., Andela, N., and Bechtold, M.: Improving the fire weather index system for peatlands using peat-specific hydrological input data, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 445–464, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-445-2024, 2024.

How to cite: Mortelmans, J., De Lannoy, G., Dunmire, D., Veraverbeke, S., Waddington, J., Scholten, R., and Bechtold, M.: Modeling peat burned area and understanding its drivers with machine learning, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-15841, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15841, 2025.