EGU25-1591, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-1591
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 01 May, 09:20–09:30 (CEST)
 
Room L1
Magnetic flux rope evolution and stability in data-driven coronal magnetic field simulations
Andreas Wagner1,2, Daniel J. Price1, Slava Bourgeois3,4, Farhad Daei1, Jens Pomoell1, Stefaan Poedts2,6, Anshu Kumari5, Teresa Barata3, Robertus Erdélyi4,7,8, and Emilia K. J. Kilpua1
Andreas Wagner et al.
  • 1Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (andreas.wagner@helsinki.fi)
  • 2CmPA/Department of Mathematics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • 3Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • 4School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • 5Udaipur Solar Observatory, Physical Research Laboratory, Udaipur, India
  • 6Institute of Physics, University of Maria Curie-Skłodowska, Lublin, Poland
  • 7Department of Astronomy, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
  • 8Gyula Bay Zoltan Solar Observatory (GSO), Gyula, Hungary

Data-driven simulations of the solar corona have gathered traction in recent years for modelling the destabilisation of magnetic flux ropes (MFRs). To correctly apply and interpret results from these modelling efforts, it is crucial to understand how MFRs behave in such simulations and why they exhibit certain behaviour. For example, one aspect is to understand what effect does the evolution of the photospheric magnetic field have on the MFR system once it has reached an already unstable state. To probe the effect of data-driving, we first run a fully data-driven time-dependent magnetofrictional (TMF) simulation. Subsequently, we systematically relax the model (i.e., turn off the photospheric driving) at different times and analyse the MFRs' behaviour. In addition to the magnetofrictional relaxation, we also employ a zero-beta magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) model for the relaxation part of the analysis and compare the differences. To extract the simulated MFRs we use our novel Graphical User Interface for Tracking and Analysing flux Ropes (GUITAR). We find that even for MFRs that have been found to be eruptive in the relaxation simulations, MFR properties can greatly vary depending on the time of relaxation. Furthermore, there are striking differences between magnetofrictional and MHD relaxation simulations; not all initial TMF states which are eruptive in MHD are eruptive in the magnetofrictional relaxation. Furthermore, not only do the MFR properties significantly vary, but also the interpretation of which instability is at play varies between the two modelling prescriptions. 

How to cite: Wagner, A., Price, D. J., Bourgeois, S., Daei, F., Pomoell, J., Poedts, S., Kumari, A., Barata, T., Erdélyi, R., and Kilpua, E. K. J.: Magnetic flux rope evolution and stability in data-driven coronal magnetic field simulations, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-1591, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-1591, 2025.