- 1Institute of Soil Research, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria (verena.rohringer@students.boku.ac.at)
- 2Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia (johannes.friedl@boku.ac.at)
Time-controlled grazing, i.e. short intensive grazing periods followed by a long rest, is promoted as a management form to counteract grassland degradation, increasing soil health, drought resilience and the sustainability and profitability of pastoral farming. Emissions of the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O) are known to respond to N substrate availability. Effects of grazing management on the distribution of N inputs and ensuing N2O emissions remain however largely unknown. This study investigated effects of continuous vs. time-controlled grazing on the magnitude and the spatial distribution of N2O emissions using a paired site approach. Emissions of N2O were measured before and after a simulated rainfall event across two extensively managed pasture sites in subtropical Queensland. Both sites were subdivided into four strata with 31 N2O sampling points per site, based on the distance to the water point. Mean N2O emissions across strata ranged from 23.5 to 22.8 g N2O-N m-2 day-1 and increased to 63.6 and 42.0 g N2O-N m-2 day-1 after the simulated rainfall event, for the continuous and time controlled grazing site, respectively. Emissions differed between strata, with highest emissions exceeding 60 g N2O-N m-2 day-1 within 100 m of the watering point and in shaded/forest areas, decreasing with distance to the water point. The spatial response of N2O emissions was consistent with NO3- concentration in the soil, likely reflecting areas of herd concentration with increased urine and dung deposition providing N substrate for N2O formation. Emissions of N2O were lower in shaded and forested areas, as well as in strata with >500 m distance to the water point under time controlled grazing as compared to continuous grazing management. The lack of treatment effect on NO3- availability and overall N2O emissions however shows no clear benefits of time controlled grazing on the distribution of N substrate availability under the conditions of this study, demanding further research to evaluate its benefits in regards to N2O mitigation from extensively managed pastures.
How to cite: Rohringer, V., Bernardini, L. G., Keiblinger, K., Rowlings, D. W., and Friedl, J.: Effects of time-controlled grazing on the magnitude and spatial distribution of N2O emissions from subtropical pastures in Australia, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-16162, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-16162, 2025.