EGU25-16327, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-16327
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 15:00–15:10 (CEST)
 
Room M1
Towards reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up national-scale N2O emission estimates in Europe
Stephan Henne1, Hélène De Longueville2, Alison Redington3, Shauna-kay Rainford4, Clemens Weber5, Peter Andrews3, Eric Saboya6, Daniela Brito Melo1, Alice Ramsden3, Brendan Murphy2, Joseph Pitt2, Alexandre Danjou2, Matthew Rigby2, Lukas Emmenegger1, Sonja G. Keel5, Benjamin Wolf6, Alistair Manning3, and Anita Ganesan6
Stephan Henne et al.
  • 1Air Pollution/Environmental Technology, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland (stephan.henne@empa.ch)
  • 2School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • 3Hadley Centre, Met Office, Exeter, UK
  • 4Climate and Agriculture Group, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 5Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research - Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
  • 6School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is the third most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG). In Europe, N2O contributes about 6 % to total GHG emissions and about 75 % of these emissions are from the agricultural sector. More than half of agricultural emissions arise from microbial production in managed soils with the amount of added fertilizer nitrogen, soil properties, and soil environmental conditions controlling the emissions. These drivers lead to large spatio-temporal variability in N2O fluxes, which is only poorly accounted for by simple bottom-up methods relying on emission factor approaches (IPCC Tier 1 and Tier 2 methods), and which are commonly used in national GHG inventory estimates.

The Horizon Europe project Process Attribution of Regional emISsions (PARIS) strives to improve national-scale flux estimates by employing regional-scale inverse modelling to atmospheric observations of N2O (top-down) and biogeochemical soil models. In recent years (2018 onwards), the density and quality of atmospheric observations in Western and Central Europe have improved to the point where inverse modelling at the temporal and spatial scales required for the comparison to nationally reported emissions (UNFCCC) and biogeochemical model output becomes feasible. Here, we report inverse modelling results for the period 2018-2023 for Western and Central Europe derived from three inverse modelling systemsnTEM, UK MetOffice; RHIME, University of Bristol; ELRIS, Empa. These were operated with two different atmospheric transport models: NAME-UM and FLEXPART-ECMWF. Overall, the total N2O fluxes agreed well, but were larger than in the national reporting to UNFCCC for several countries in Western and Central Europe. Results confirmed strong seasonality in N2O fluxes for the UK, Benelux, and Germany. In comparison, fluxes from France exhibited less pronounced seasonality. The variability in N2O fluxes was analysed with respect to environmental drivers, corroborating the important role of soil temperature and soil water content. Finally, the results allow a first comparison of the inversely obtained N2O fluxes and fluxes simulated by two biogeochemistry models for agricultural soils in Switzerland (DayCent, Agroscope) and Germany (LandscapeDNDC, KIT).

How to cite: Henne, S., De Longueville, H., Redington, A., Rainford, S., Weber, C., Andrews, P., Saboya, E., Brito Melo, D., Ramsden, A., Murphy, B., Pitt, J., Danjou, A., Rigby, M., Emmenegger, L., Keel, S. G., Wolf, B., Manning, A., and Ganesan, A.: Towards reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up national-scale N2O emission estimates in Europe, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-16327, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-16327, 2025.