EGU25-19242, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-19242
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 28 Apr, 10:00–10:10 (CEST)
 
Room 3.29/30
Diffuse pollution management in agricultural landscapes – a combined Source:Pathway Priority Index to target advice and resources for impact. 
Rachel Cassidy1, Thomas Service1, Kevin Atcheson2, Taylor Harrison1, Alex Higgins1, Luke Farrow1, Paddy Jack1, and Phil Jordan2
Rachel Cassidy et al.
  • 1Agri-Food and Bioscience Institute, AFBI, Agri-Environment, Belfast, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (rachel.cassidy@afbini.gov.uk)
  • 2School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK

Diffuse pollution is a global issue where management, particularly of phosphorus (P) loss from agricultural land to water, must address both source and pathway pressures concurrently as part of effective mitigation. Where this is a widespread issue, policy makers, agri-environmental managers and farmers need a process of prioritisation that places the delivery point for diffuse P to a waterbody into a wider context of risk and maximises the impact of any mitigation for the limited resource available. However, data requirements and lack of a unified method have made this difficult to implement.

This study considers this challenge using field-by-field soil test P monitoring and high-resolution LiDAR runoff risk modelling being developed for all agricultural land in Northern Ireland through the Soil Nutrient Health Scheme. We combine long-term available water quality data for macro- and meso-scale catchments with this unique spatially explicit data set on soil test P and runoff risk (Hydrologically Sensitive Area (HSA)) combinations to rank risk to water quality down to a base unit of a micro-catchment scale (0.02 – 1.6 km2) delineated upslope from each delivery point to a waterbody. This is expressed as a dimensionless Source:Pressure Priority Index (SPPI) which conveys the combined source and pathway risk at a location but without any dimensioned values that would link to soil test P in specific fields and affect confidentiality of field-scale nutrient status information. With an average of 250 delivery points km-2 this approach can filter the highest category SPPI areas to ~1% of those micro-catchments where measures should be targeted first.

This combination and analysis of “big data” provides a whole-landscape risk ranking method for diffuse pollution management that can be directed centrally and rolled out more locally as part of catchment level agri-environmental schemes (AES) and in targeting advisory and extension services. This will ensure a faster route to diffuse pollution reduction and offer resilience as pathway mitigations become vulnerable to weather patterns and runoff responses in a changing climate.

How to cite: Cassidy, R., Service, T., Atcheson, K., Harrison, T., Higgins, A., Farrow, L., Jack, P., and Jordan, P.: Diffuse pollution management in agricultural landscapes – a combined Source:Pathway Priority Index to target advice and resources for impact. , EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-19242, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-19242, 2025.