EGU25-19331, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-19331
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 02 May, 14:30–14:40 (CEST)
 
Room -2.20
Remote monitoring of Soil Health: Insights into the impacts of biomineralization applications to build soil health
Nichola Knox1,2,3, Jacqueline McGlade1,4,5, Chris Lakey1,6, Kym Kruse7, and Nigel Sharp7
Nichola Knox et al.
  • 1Downforce Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom (nicky@downforce.tech, jacquie@downforce.tech, chris@downforce.tech)
  • 2College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia (nicky@downforce.tech)
  • 3School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE), Arizona State University, Tempe, United States (nicky@downforce.tech)
  • 4Institute for Public Policy and Governance, Strathmore University Business School, Nairobi, Kenya (jacquie@downforce.tech)
  • 5Institute for Global Prosperity, UCL, London, United Kingdom (jacquie@downforce.tech)
  • 6Department of Mathematics, University of York, York, United Kingdom (chris@downforce.tech)
  • 7Circle Ag, Australia (nigel.sharp@tiverton-rothwell.com.au,info@regenag.com)

Soils are the largest terrestrial carbon store on the planet. However, it is estimated that soils have lost 8% of their carbon content since human farming began. Around the world, agricultural soils are highly degraded and are a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions.

 

Soil carbon content is a good proxy for soil health. Healthy soils are more resilient to climate shocks, achieve high yield to input ratios, produce nutrient rich food, as well as making the soil a net carbon sink. From a climate change perspective as well as a food security perspective, there is growing interest in rebuilding soil health, requiring effective measurement and monitoring.

 

Traditionally, measuring soil carbon relies on in-situ sampling.  This is expensive and labour intensive and so encourages low density sampling and infrequent repeat measurements.   However, through a remote digital soil mapping (DSM) approach combining globally available sampling, environmental data - aligned with SCORPAN and remote sensing data we have developed a methodology which enables monitoring soil health in response to interventions and practices for example, biomineralization applications, or cropping rotations.

 

Using the Downforce digital twin approach, which has been calibrated globally, and validated within the case study areas, we will present a set of case studies in which we remotely monitor variable biomineralization applications over more than 10,000ha, under varying farming practices (livestock and cropping) in Victoria, Australia.  The case studies provide evidence that the applied biofertilizer, which is designed to catalyse non-labile minerals and nutrients present in the soil into labile forms, not only improve soil health but also increase nutrient density in crops and livestock.  The potential of this DSM approach to provide near-real time insights at hyperlocal to landscape scales is unique and is enabling transformative and adaptive management in conservation and agriculture, at a fraction of the cost of in-situ sampling.

How to cite: Knox, N., McGlade, J., Lakey, C., Kruse, K., and Sharp, N.: Remote monitoring of Soil Health: Insights into the impacts of biomineralization applications to build soil health, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-19331, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-19331, 2025.