- 1IBM Research, Daresbury, United Kingdom
- 2Oak Ridge National Laboratory, National Center for Computational Sciences, Oak Ridge, United States
- 3IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, United States
- 4NASA MSFC IMPACT / University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, United States
- 5University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, United States
- 6University of Alabama in Huntsville, Earth System Science Center, Huntsville, United States
- 7Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
- 8University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- 9NASA, Huntsville, United States
- 10NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, United States
AI-based weather emulators have begun to rival the accuracy of traditional numerical solvers, for a fraction of the computational cost. The question of whether they can be reliably deployed in all use cases (e.g., for the forecast of extreme scenarios), however, is still open. We outline an ensembling strategy based on architectural variations of the Prithvi WxC foundation model (FM), highlighting the impact of each of these variations on physical accuracy and ability to capture the distributional extremes. A simple of ensemble of 100 models is sufficient to observe the complex mapping between configuration parameters and the forecast sensitivity of different atmospheric variables. We characterize some features of this mapping and connect them to the task of predicting various weather extremes.
How to cite: Bentivegna, E., Anantharaj, V., Schmude, J., Roy, S., Kumar, A., Lin, A., Shivanand, S., Papamarkou, T., Allmendinger, R., Maskey, M., and Ramachandran, R.: From architecture to atmospheric sensitivity: studying forecast uncertainty with Prithvi-WxC, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-19821, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-19821, 2025.