- 1University of Helsinki, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Food and Nutrition, Helsinki, Finland (yajie.gao@helsinki.fi)
- 2Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), Helsinki, Finland
- 3Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- 4Environmental Soil Science, Department of Agricultural Soil Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- 5Institute for Atmosphere and Earth System Research, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Finland
- 6Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Finland
Background aims: Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely used to evaluate the carbon footprint (CF) of milk production. Changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock play a vital role in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. However, no consensus has been reached to incorporate SOC changes into agricultural LCA. This study aims to evaluate the CF of milk production using LCA methodology with integrating SOC balance based on data from Viikki Research Farm at Helsinki. Methods: The CF of milk production was analyzed for 2022 and 2023 using the Solagro Carbon Calculator. Furthermore, the study explored the soil carbon and nitrogen balances using the DNDC model, for a comparison with IPCC Tier 1 & Tier 2 methods and the real measurements. Results and conclusions: Real measurements demonstrated substantial SOC loss from grassland and subsequent annual cropland, which was 607 and 3939 kg C ha-1 in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Incorporation of those results increased the CF of milk production. Estimated based on DNDC modeling, the SOC loss exceeded the measured results in 2022 and was underestimated in 2023, while the IPCC method showed SOC sequestration in 2022. The observed emissions fluctuation between the two years was related to the rotation between perennial grass and annual crop, and harsh wintertime conditions affecting crop growth. This study underscores the importance of SOC change in agricultural LCAs. While direct measurements may have limitations, a more profound understanding of SOC dynamics and better calculation is crucial to minimize bias in CF estimations.
How to cite: Gao, Y., Hu, T., Roitto, M., Jokiniemi, T., Sandell, M., Pihlatie, M., and Tuomisto, H.: Life cycle assessment of milk production: integrating changes in soil carbon stock with eddy covariance and DNDC modeling, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-20229, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20229, 2025.