EGU25-20329, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20329
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 10:45–12:30 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 30 Apr, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X3, X3.102
Influence of bed surface roughness on flow in rough-bed rivers
Robert Houseago1,2, Rebecca Hodge2, Rob Ferguson2, Stephen Rice3, David Whitfield1,2, Christopher Hackney4, Richard Hardy2, Joel Johnson5, Trevor Hoey6, Elowyn Yager7, and Taís Yamasaki1
Robert Houseago et al.
  • 1Loughborough University, Department of Geography and Environment, UK (r.houseago@lboro.ac.uk)
  • 2Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK
  • 3Department of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
  • 4School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
  • 5Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
  • 6Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
  • 7Center for Ecohydraulics Research, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Idaho, Boise, ID, USA

Riverbed surface roughness (or topography) modulates channel hydrodynamics, including the velocity and turbulence distributions, which underpin flood risk and sediment transport. Our recent research has presented the diversity of bed surface roughness found in bedrock and boulder-bed channels, prompting an investigation into the subsequent relationships between channel roughness and flow. Here, we investigate the influence of riverbed topography on velocity distributions and bulk flow resistance via physical modelling using 1:10 scaled flume experiments. Three bedrock riverbeds spanning from smooth to rough were reproduced from high-resolution laser scans. For each bed, the addition of boulders was tested for five boulder densities spanning from 5% to 55% coverage. Each combination of bed and boulders was measured at five incoming bulk discharges. Vertical profiles of the streamwise velocity reveal the deviations in velocity distribution over the beds, while depth and discharge measurements enabled the calculation of the Darcy-Weisbach friction factor for each of the five bulk discharges. The results show conditions of wake interference and skimming flow regimes, yet the traditional regime transition thresholds based on boulder coverage are not consistent, indicating the importance of the underlying bed roughness. Topographic data from Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry of the beds was used to calculate surface roughness topographic metrics that correlate to changes in the bulk flow resistance and provide scope for improved predictions.   

How to cite: Houseago, R., Hodge, R., Ferguson, R., Rice, S., Whitfield, D., Hackney, C., Hardy, R., Johnson, J., Hoey, T., Yager, E., and Yamasaki, T.: Influence of bed surface roughness on flow in rough-bed rivers, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-20329, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20329, 2025.