- 1Brookhaven National Laboratory, Environmental and Climate Sciences, Upton, United States of America (lyg@bnl.gov)
- 2Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA
- 3University of Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
- 4Hangzhou Meteorological Bureau, Hangzhou, China
Despite decades of research and progress, climate models still suffer from large uncertainty in estimated aerosol indirect effects and large discrepancy with observations. Understanding of aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI) and their representation in climate models still pose vital challenges even for the simplest of all clouds – warm liquid clouds. In particular, different, even opposite, results have been reported in different studies of both the first and second aerosol indirect effects, awaiting physical explanation. This study conducts systematic classification of ACI regimes by analyzing decade-long surface-based measurements collected by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) facility under the frame of Twomey vs anti-Twomey and Albrecht vs. anti-Albrecht effects. Inspection of confounding factors (e.g., vertical motion, entrainment, decoupling, and stability) and potential micro-macro interactions will also made to provide physical understanding of the occurrence of the different ACI regimes, together with AI-based causal analysis.
How to cite: Liu, Y., Su, Y., Zhang, T., Anwar, K., and Liu, W.: Regime Classification and AI-Enhanced Causal Analysis of Aerosol-Cloud Interactions Based on Long-Term Observations, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-20619, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20619, 2025.