- 1Chalmers University of Technology, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Space, Earth and Environment, Gothenburg, Sweden (luisa.ickes@chalmers.se)
- 2Barcelona Supercomputing Center, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
- 3Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
- 4Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
- 5Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management, Wageningen University, 6708PB Wageningen, Netherlands
- 6Department of Physics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
- 7Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
- 8Department of Project and Construction Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya – Barcelona TECH (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
- 9Center for the Study of Air Quality and Climate Change, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, 70013 Patras, Greece.
- 10Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
- 11The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, 1 0313 Oslo, Norway.
Global climate models poorly represent mixed-phase clouds in a realistic way, which leads to uncertainties in cloud radiative forcing and precipitation. In the FORCeS ice experiment (FOR-ICE) we compare three global climate models (ECHAM-HAM, NorESM, EC-Earth) and show which processes are crucial for a realistic representation of cloud ice and supercooled water in each global climate model framework using the factorial method as a statistical approach. A specific focus of the experiments is on secondary ice production (SIP) - which apart from one mechanism (rime splintering) is not represented in models, even if observations of ice crystal concentrations of ice crystal number in warm mixed-phase clouds often exceed available ice nuclei by orders of magnitude. We evaluate the importance of three SIP mechanisms combined (rime splintering, ice-ice collisions, and droplet shattering) compared to all other processes that can modulate ice mass and number in mixed-phase clouds: ice nucleation, sedimentation, and transport of ice crystals. Satellite observations are used to evaluate the representation of mixed-phase clouds. We found large discrepancies in dominant microphysical processes for mixed-phase clouds across the investigated climate models.
How to cite: Ickes, L., Frostenberg, H., Costa Surós, M., Georgakaki, P., Proske, U., Sotiropoulou, G., May, E., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Eriksson, P., Lewinschall, A., Nenes, A., Neubauer, D., Pérez García-Pando, C., and Sedland, Ø.: Dominant microphysical processes for mixed-phase clouds across climate models, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-20620, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20620, 2025.