EGU25-20620, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20620
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Monday, 28 Apr, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Monday, 28 Apr, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.16
Dominant microphysical processes for mixed-phase clouds across climate models
Luisa Ickes1, Hannah Frostenberg1, Montserrat Costa Surós2, Paraskevi Georgakaki3, Ulrike Proske5, Georgia Sotiropoulou6, Eleanor May1, Maria Gonçalves Ageitos2,8, Patrick Eriksson1, Anna Lewinschall7, Athanasios Nenes3,9, David Neubauer4, Carlos Pérez García-Pando2,10, and Øyvind Sedland11
Luisa Ickes et al.
  • 1Chalmers University of Technology, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Space, Earth and Environment, Gothenburg, Sweden (luisa.ickes@chalmers.se)
  • 2Barcelona Supercomputing Center, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
  • 3Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • 4Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • 5Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management, Wageningen University, 6708PB Wageningen, Netherlands
  • 6Department of Physics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
  • 7Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 8Department of Project and Construction Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya – Barcelona TECH (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
  • 9Center for the Study of Air Quality and Climate Change, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, 70013 Patras, Greece.
  • 10Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
  • 11The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, 1 0313 Oslo, Norway.

Global climate models poorly represent mixed-phase clouds in a realistic way, which leads to uncertainties in cloud radiative forcing and precipitation. In the FORCeS ice experiment (FOR-ICE) we compare three global climate models (ECHAM-HAM, NorESM, EC-Earth) and show which processes are crucial for a realistic representation of cloud ice and supercooled water in each global climate model framework using the factorial method as a statistical approach. A specific focus of the experiments is on secondary ice production (SIP) - which apart from one mechanism (rime splintering) is not represented in models, even if observations of ice crystal concentrations of ice crystal number in warm mixed-phase clouds often exceed available ice nuclei by orders of magnitude. We evaluate the importance of three SIP mechanisms combined (rime splintering, ice-ice collisions, and droplet shattering) compared to all other processes that can modulate ice mass and number in mixed-phase clouds: ice nucleation, sedimentation, and transport of ice crystals. Satellite observations are used to evaluate the representation of mixed-phase clouds. We found large discrepancies in dominant microphysical processes for mixed-phase clouds across the investigated climate models.

How to cite: Ickes, L., Frostenberg, H., Costa Surós, M., Georgakaki, P., Proske, U., Sotiropoulou, G., May, E., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Eriksson, P., Lewinschall, A., Nenes, A., Neubauer, D., Pérez García-Pando, C., and Sedland, Ø.: Dominant microphysical processes for mixed-phase clouds across climate models, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-20620, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20620, 2025.