EGU25-2154, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-2154
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 29 Apr, 16:18–16:28 (CEST)
 
Room 0.51
Spatiotemporal modeling and mapping of soil organic carbon density with uncertainty quantification across Europe (2000–2022)
Xuemeng Tian1,2, Sytze de Bruin2, Rolf Simoes1, Mustafa Serkan Isik1, Robert Minarik1, Yu-Feng Ho1, Murat Şahin3, Martin Herold2,4, Davide Consoli1, and Tomislav Hengl1
Xuemeng Tian et al.
  • 1OpenGeoHub, Doorwerth, The Netherlands
  • 2Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • 3Department of Geosciences & Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • 4Helmholtz GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics, Potsdam, Germany

The paper describes a comprehensive framework for soil organic carbon density (SOCD) (kg/m3) modeling and mapping, based on spatiotemporal Random Forest (RF) and Quantile Regression Forests (QRF). A total of 45,616 SOCD measurements and various feature layers, particularly 30m Landsat-based spectral indices, were used to produce 30m SOCD maps for the EU at four-year intervals (2000--2022) and four soil depth intervals (0--20cm, 20--50cm, 50--100cm, and 100--200cm). Per-pixel 95% probability prediction intervals (PIs) and extrapolation probabilities are also provided. Model evaluation indicates consistent accuracy, with R2 between 0.53--0.67 and CCC 0.68--0.80 across cross-validations and independent tests. Prediction accuracy varies by land cover, depth interval and year of prediction with accuracy the worst for shrubland and deeper soils 100--200cm. PI validation confirmed effective uncertainty estimation, though with reduced accuracy for higher SOCD values. Shapley analysis identified soil depth as the most influential feature, followed by vegetation, long-term bioclimate, and topographic features. While pixel-level uncertainty is substantial, spatial aggregation reduces uncertainty by approximately 66%. Detecting SOCD changes remains challenging but offers a baseline for future improvements. Maps, based primarily on topsoil data from cropland, grassland, and woodland, are best suited for applications related to these land covers and depths. Users should interpret the maps with local knowledge and consider the uncertainty and extrapolation probability layers. All data and code are available under an open license at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13754343 and https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/.

How to cite: Tian, X., de Bruin, S., Simoes, R., Isik, M. S., Minarik, R., Ho, Y.-F., Şahin, M., Herold, M., Consoli, D., and Hengl, T.: Spatiotemporal modeling and mapping of soil organic carbon density with uncertainty quantification across Europe (2000–2022), EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-2154, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-2154, 2025.