EGU25-2631, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-2631
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 01 May, 11:25–11:35 (CEST)
 
Room D1
Comparative study on seismic response of a shallow buried underground structure in coral sand and coral gravelly sand by centrifuge modeling
Zhongxiang Zhang1, Su Chen1, Yongzhi Wang3, and Xiaojun Li1,2
Zhongxiang Zhang et al.
  • 1BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, THE COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, State Key Laboratory of Bridge Safety and Resilience, China (td_zhangzhongxiang@163.com)
  • 2Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • 3Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China

Coral sand, as a geological material for foundation filling, is widely used for reclamation projects in coral reef areas. The coral sand is characterized by a wide grain size distribution. A series of centrifuge shaking table tests were conducted to explore the seismic response of a shallow buried underground structure in saturated coral sand and coral gravelly sand. The emphasis was placed on comparing the similarities and differences in the dynamic behavior of the underground structure at the two sites. The responses of excess pore pressure, acceleration, displacement, and dynamic soil pressure of the structure were analyzed in detail. The results indicated that the underground structure in coral sand had a significant influence on the development of excess pore pressure in the surrounding soil, but this effect was not evident in coral gravelly sand due to well-drained channels. Liquefaction was observed in the soil layer around the structure in coral sand, but it did not occur in coral gravelly sand. In coral sand, the liquefaction of the soil layer at the bottom of the structure caused a significant attenuation in the acceleration of the structure. Compared to coral gravelly sand, the acceleration response of the soil layer near the bottom of the underground structure was higher in coral sand. During the shaking, the displacement pattern of the structure in coral gravelly sand was slight subsidence-slight upliftsignificant subsidence, while it exhibited a significant uplift in coral sand. The maximum dynamic soil pressure distribution on the structural sidewalls presented a trapezoidal distribution, and the dynamic soil pressure had a strong connection with the development of excess pore pressure in the surrounding soil.

How to cite: Zhang, Z., Chen, S., Wang, Y., and Li, X.: Comparative study on seismic response of a shallow buried underground structure in coral sand and coral gravelly sand by centrifuge modeling, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-2631, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-2631, 2025.