EGU25-33, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-33
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PICO | Friday, 02 May, 16:36–16:38 (CEST)
 
PICO spot 5, PICO5.5
Automatic infrasound monitoring at the Central and Eastern European Infrasound Network via Machine Learning
Marcell Pásztor1,2, Tereza Šindelářová3, Daniela Ghica4, Ulrike Mitterbauer5, Alexander Liashchuk6, Giorgio Lacanna7, Maurizio Ripepe7, and István Bondár8
Marcell Pásztor et al.
  • 1Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, Department of Geophysics and Space Science, Budapest, Hungary
  • 2Kövesligethy Radó Seismological Observatory, HUN-REN Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, Budapest, Hungary (pasztor.marcell@epss.hun-ren.hu)
  • 3The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Prague, Czechia
  • 4National Institute for Earth Physics (NIEP), Magurele, Romania
  • 5GeoSphere Austria, Vienna, Austria
  • 6Main Centre of Special Monitoring, National Center for Control and Testing of Space, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 7Department of Earth Sciences, University of Florence, Florance, Italy
  • 8Seismic Location Services, Lagos, Portugal

The Central and Eastern European Infrasound Network (CEEIN) consists of nine infrasound arrays managed by research institutes in the Czech Republic, Austria, Hungary, Ukraine, and Romania. A hybrid machine learning model was previously developed to differentiate between natural and anthropogenic sources of infrasound. This model categorizes signals from thunderstorms, activity from Mount Etna, and human-related sources, including quarry blasts, power plants, oil refineries, and the conflict in Ukraine. The dataset includes more than 100,000 labeled detections spanning from 2017 to 2024. The hybrid model combines a Convolutional Neural Network, trained on spectrograms, with a Random Forest classifier, trained on features derived from the Progressive Multi-Channel Correlation (PMCC) method, which is used for processing the raw data. The model performed well on the test data (F1 score > 0.9); however, to assess its capabilities for near-real-time monitoring, the model was retrained with randomly selected, unlabeled detections from outside the aforementioned classes. Here, we present findings from several months of automatic monitoring, assessing both single array and network processing performance.

How to cite: Pásztor, M., Šindelářová, T., Ghica, D., Mitterbauer, U., Liashchuk, A., Lacanna, G., Ripepe, M., and Bondár, I.: Automatic infrasound monitoring at the Central and Eastern European Infrasound Network via Machine Learning, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-33, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-33, 2025.