EGU25-3539, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3539
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 08:30–10:15 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 30 Apr, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X5, X5.132
Overcoming challenges in urban hydro-meteorological simulation: Where is our first step?
Xuan Chen, Job Augustijn van der Werf, Arjan Droste, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Xuan Chen et al.
  • Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands

Urban areas, with their dense populations and numerous socio-economic activities, are increasingly vulnerable to floods, droughts, and heat stress due to land use changes and climate change. Traditionally, the urban thermal environment and water resources management have been studied separately using urban land surface models (ULSMs) and urban hydrological models (UHMs). However, as our understanding deepens and the urgency to address future climate disasters grows, it becomes evident that hydroclimatological disasters—such as floods, droughts, severe urban thermal environments, and more frequent heat waves—are not isolated events but compound events. This highlights the close interaction between the water cycle and the energy balance. Consequently, the existing separation between ULSMs and UHMs creates significant obstacles in better understanding urban hydrological and meteorological processes, which is crucial for addressing the high risks posed by climate change. Defining the future direction of process-based models for hydro-meteorological predictions and assessments is essential for better managing climate disasters and evaluating response measures in densely populated urban areas. Our review focuses on three critical aspects of urban hydro-meteorological simulation: similarities, differences, and gaps among different models; existing gaps in physical process implementations; and efforts, challenges, and potential for model coupling and integration. We find that ULSMs inadequately represent water surfaces and hydraulic systems, while UHMs lack explicit surface energy balance solutions and detailed building representations. Coupled models show potential for simulating urban hydro-meteorological environments but face challenges at regional and neighborhood scales. Our review highlights the need for interdisciplinary communication between the urban climatology and urban water management communities to enhance urban hydro-meteorological simulation models.

How to cite: Chen, X., van der Werf, J. A., Droste, A., Coenders-Gerrits, M., and Uijlenhoet, R.: Overcoming challenges in urban hydro-meteorological simulation: Where is our first step?, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-3539, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3539, 2025.