- 1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, IMK-IFU, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany (benjamin.wolf@kit.edu)
- 2Department for Environment, Agricultural and Forest Systems, Agri-Food Research and Technology Centre of Aragon (CITA), 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
- 3Chair of Organic Farming with focus on Sustainable Soil Use, Justus Liebig University, Karl-Glöckner Str. 21C, 35392 Giessen, Germany
An evaluation of the susceptibility of different N management systems to nitrogen (N) losses into the environment requires either the in-situ determination of the individual components of the nitrogen balance or the determination of the recovery of fertilizer N in plants and soil. For both aspects, 15N methods are essential as the 15N gas flux method (15NGF) is the only widespread in-situ method for the determination of dinitrogen (N2) emissions, and 15N labelled fertilizers can be used to assess the allocation of fertilizer N to plants and soil.
To evaluate the influence of management history on N losses, we quantified N loss pathways (NH3, N2O, N2, NO3- leaching), total N balance and 15N recovery in soil and plants of two adjacent sites over a two-year cropping sequence. One site was under integrated farming (IF) and the other under organic farming (OF) with frequent legume cultivation and occasional fertilizer input.
Though integrated farming had resulted in significantly higher pH, soil organic C and N content, the emissions of ammonia, dinitrogen and nitrous oxide after cattle slurry application as well as nitrate leaching were low and not significantly different. High 15N recovery rates in plants and soil agreed well with the low directly measured N losses. Integrating the directly measured losses into the 15N balance resulted in high overall recoveries of 84 to 100%. Conversely, unrecovered 15N was on a low level, but higher for OF (12%) than for IF (6%).
Our results confirm that 15N labelled fertilizers and their recovery can be used as an indicator for N losses, but the spatial variability is high, complicating statistically significant findings. Consideration of N2 fluxes using the 15NGF method could not close the 15N balance, indicating that unaccounted N losses have occurred. Since the directly measured N losses were not significantly different, unaccounted losses could be due to N2 emissions as their quantification was limited to two weeks after fertilizer application.
Overall, integrated farming history reduced the vulnerability towards N loss, but continuous methods for determination of N2 emissions, such as isotopomer measurements, need to be tested concomitantly, and uncertainty of 15N recovery in plants and soil needs to be reduced by more sophisticated sample mixing approaches.
How to cite: Wolf, B., Khan, F., Franco Luesma, S., Hartmann, F., Dannenmann, M., Gasche, R., Scheer, C., Gattinger, A., Niether, W., and Kiese, R.: Role of 15N methods for assessing the susceptibility of agricultural N management systems to environmental N losses, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-3735, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3735, 2025.