EGU25-3829, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3829
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 28 Apr, 14:35–14:45 (CEST)
 
Room 0.96/97
Do microbes regulate CUE or nutrient recycling to cope with nutrient limitation?
Stefano Manzoni1, Maja Siegenthaler2, Samia Ghersheen3, Björn Lindahl4, and Marie Spohn5
Stefano Manzoni et al.
  • 1Department of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden (stefano.manzoni@natgeo.su.se)
  • 2Department of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden (maja.siegenthaler@natgeo.su.se)
  • 3Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (samia.ghersheen@slu.se)
  • 4Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (Bjorn.Lindahl@slu.se)
  • 5Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (marie.spohn@slu.se)

Nitrogen (N) limitation can have contrasting consequences on carbon (C) and N cycling in soils, depending on how soil microbes regulate their use of C and N. If microbes respond to N limitation by respiring or excreting more C (overflow hypothesis), C losses from the soil increase with decreasing N availability. In contrast, if under N limitation microbes use N more efficiently and rely less on the scarce available N, C and N can remain in the soil and possibly be stabilized. Efficient N use can be achieved by fungi via resorption of N from senescing mycelium, and in general via local recycling of N when cells die. Here we use a minimal model of litter decomposition to assess how microbes use C and N in litter types with contrasting N contents. The model is fitted to about 500 litter decomposition datasets to estimate microbial C use efficiency (CUE, defined as ratio of growth over C uptake) or N resorption efficiency. Model variants assuming that microbes regulate either their CUE or their N resorption can capture N accumulation and release well, but the latter variants have higher overall performance. This indicates that N resorption can be a fundamental mechanism to cope with N limitation. Moreover, N resorption efficiency as estimated from model fitting decreases with increasing initial litter N content or during decomposition as litter becomes enriched in N. This result implies that N resorption regulation can occur both across litter types with contrasting N contents, and during decomposition within a certain litter cohort. We conclude that N resorption is an ecologically more meaningful strategy to grow in N limited conditions compared to C overflow.

How to cite: Manzoni, S., Siegenthaler, M., Ghersheen, S., Lindahl, B., and Spohn, M.: Do microbes regulate CUE or nutrient recycling to cope with nutrient limitation?, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-3829, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3829, 2025.